ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2023
A six-participant pilot single-subject study of an individualized pain management program for people with spinal cord injury.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participant perspectives on a multimodal program for neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Psychologically based interventions for adults with chronic neuropathic pain: a scoping review.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designSingle-subject repeated measures design.
objectivesTo explore the impacts of a novel individualized interdisciplinary pain self-management program for persons living with spinal cord injury pain.
settingA large rehabilitation institute for adults with physical disabilities in Quebec city (Quebec, Canada).
methodsSix persons having sustained a spinal cord injury and experiencing chronic pain participated. Following a five-week pre-intervention phase (baseline repeated measures) and a clinical evaluation, individualized intervention objectives were developed in collaboration with each participant. Then, participants completed a ten-week intensive intervention and a six-month consolidation phase. The program included cognitive behavioral therapy, and physical and pharmacological interventions, which were group- and individual-based. Outcome measures were the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), the French-Canadian Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale (FC-CPSES), the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
resultsFor five out of the six participants, a majority of outcomes improved during either of the intervention phases or both. Improvements in occupational performance were clinically significant for three participants. Pain interference and anxiety improved significantly in five participants, while pain self-efficacy and depressive symptoms improved in four participants.
conclusionsThe results suggest that the pain self-management program was effective to reduce the impact of spinal cord injury pain. Further research is needed to replicate these results in a larger study and comprehend the factors favoring or undermining improvements with such programs, as well as their persistence over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.