Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36646680›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2023

Technology used in activity based therapy for individuals living with spinal cord injury across Canada.

Cindy Gauthier, Kristen Walden, Hope Jervis-Rademeyer, Kristin E Musselman, Anita Kaiser, Dalton L Wolfe, Vanessa K Noonan, Sarah J Donkers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cindy GauthierDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kristen WaldenPraxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Hope Jervis-RademeyerKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute -University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kristin E MusselmanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8336-8211
Anita KaiserKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute -University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3521-7432
Dalton L WolfeParkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
Vanessa K NoonanPraxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sarah J DonkersSchool of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. sarah.donkers@usask.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designCross-sectional equipment inventory.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to describe the equipment used in activity-based therapy (ABT) programs for individuals with spinal cord injury or disorder (SCI/D) across Canada. SETTINGS: Publicly funded and private SCI/D care settings.

methodsA survey on equipment available for ABT for different therapeutic goals was answered by Canadian sites providing SCI/D rehabilitation. Information about the setting and type of client were also collected. The survey results were compiled into an inventory of the reported types and use of ABT related equipment, with equipment grouped into varying levels of technology. Descriptive statistics and qualitative descriptive analysis were used to answer the questions: (1) 'who' used the equipment, (2) 'what' types of equipment are used, (3) 'why' (i.e., for which therapeutic goals), and (4) 'how' it is used.

resultsTwenty-two sites from eight Canadian provinces completed the survey. Reported equipment was classified into 5 categories (from low to high-tech). Most equipment reported was used to train balance. The high-tech equipment reported as available, was mostly used for walking training and strengthening of the lower limbs. Low-tech equipment was reported as being used most frequently, while high-tech devices, although available, were reported as infrequently or rarely used.

conclusionsA large spectrum of equipment with varying levels of technology were reported as available, but were inconsistently used to provide ABT interventions across sites. In order to increase the clinical use of available equipment for ABT, education tools such as protocols regarding ABT principles and implementation are needed.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesWalkingCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36646680
PMCPMC9842763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.