Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36646464›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2023

Cross-sectional associations of different types of nature exposure with psychotropic, antihypertensive and asthma medication.

Anu W Turunen, Jaana Halonen, Kalevi Korpela, Ann Ojala, Tytti Pasanen, Taina Siponen, Pekka Tiittanen, Liisa Tyrväinen, Tarja Yli-Tuomi, Timo Lanki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Investigation of Epistemic Equity in Urban Green Space and Mental Health Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Nature prescription for patients with chronic respiratory diseases.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anu W TurunenDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland anu.turunen@thl.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-4958-3599
Jaana HalonenDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1142-0388
Kalevi KorpelaFaculty of Social Sciences (Psychology), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Ann OjalaBioeconomy and Environment, Natural Resources Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Tytti PasanenDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland.
Taina SiponenDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland.
Pekka TiittanenDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland.
Liisa TyrväinenBioeconomy and Environment, Natural Resources Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Tarja Yli-TuomiDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland.
Timo LankiDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to natural environments is thought to be beneficial for human health, but the evidence is inconsistent.

objectiveTo examine whether exposure to green and blue spaces in urban environments is associated with mental and physical health in Finland.

methodsThe Helsinki Capital Region Environmental Health Survey was conducted in 2015-2016 in Helsinki, Espoo and Vantaa in Finland (n=7321). Cross-sectional associations of the amounts of residential green and blue spaces within 1 km radius around the respondent's home (based on the Urban Atlas 2012), green and blue views from home and green space visits with self-reported use of psychotropic (anxiolytics, hypnotics and antidepressants), antihypertensive and asthma medication were examined using logistic regression models. Indicators of health behaviour, traffic-related outdoor air pollution and noise and socioeconomic status (SES) were used as covariates, the last of these also as a potential effect modifier.

resultsAmounts of residential green and blue spaces or green and blue views from home were not associated with medications. However, the frequency of green space visits was associated with lower odds of using psychotropic medication (OR=0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82 for 3-4 times/week; 0.78, 0.63 to 0.96 for ≥5 times/week) and antihypertensive (0.64, 0.52 to 0.78; 0.59, 0.48 to 0.74, respectively) and asthma (0.74, 0.58 to 0.94; 0.76, 0.59 to 0.99, respectively) medication use. The observed associations were attenuated by body mass index, but no consistent interactions with SES indicators were observed.

conclusionsFrequent green space visits, but not the amounts of residential green or blue spaces, or green and blue views from home, were associated with less frequent use of psychotropic, antihypertensive and asthma medication in urban environments.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsAsthmaCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmentHumansNoisePsychotropic DrugsAntihypertensive AgentsPsychotropic DrugsCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmentEpidemiologyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID36646464
PMCPMC9887361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.