Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36646444›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2023

Real-time radial reconstruction with domain transform manifold learning for MRI-guided radiotherapy.

David E J Waddington, Nicholas Hindley, Neha Koonjoo, Christopher Chiu, Tess Reynolds, Paul Z Y Liu, Bo Zhu, Danyal Bhutto, Chiara Paganelli, Paul J Keall and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Real-Time Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Brain imaging with portable low-field MRI.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

David E J WaddingtonImage X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Nicholas HindleyImage X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Neha KoonjooA. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Christopher ChiuImage X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Tess ReynoldsImage X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Paul Z Y LiuImage X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Bo ZhuA. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Danyal BhuttoA. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Chiara PaganelliDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Paul J KeallImage X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Matthew S RosenA. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USIngham Institute · AUThe University of Sydney · AUBoston University · USPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMRI-guidance techniques that dynamically adapt radiation beams to follow tumor motion in real time will lead to more accurate cancer treatments and reduced collateral healthy tissue damage. The gold-standard for reconstruction of undersampled MR data is compressed sensing (CS) which is computationally slow and limits the rate that images can be available for real-time adaptation. PURPOSE: Once trained, neural networks can be used to accurately reconstruct raw MRI data with minimal latency. Here, we test the suitability of deep-learning-based image reconstruction for real-time tracking applications on MRI-Linacs.

methodsWe use automated transform by manifold approximation (AUTOMAP), a generalized framework that maps raw MR signal to the target image domain, to rapidly reconstruct images from undersampled radial k-space data. The AUTOMAP neural network was trained to reconstruct images from a golden-angle radial acquisition, a benchmark for motion-sensitive imaging, on lung cancer patient data and generic images from ImageNet. Model training was subsequently augmented with motion-encoded k-space data derived from videos in the YouTube-8M dataset to encourage motion robust reconstruction.

resultsAUTOMAP models fine-tuned on retrospectively acquired lung cancer patient data reconstructed radial k-space with equivalent accuracy to CS but with much shorter processing times. Validation of motion-trained models with a virtual dynamic lung tumor phantom showed that the generalized motion properties learned from YouTube lead to improved target tracking accuracy.

conclusionAUTOMAP can achieve real-time, accurate reconstruction of radial data. These findings imply that neural-network-based reconstruction is potentially superior to alternative approaches for real-time image guidance applications.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMotionNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective Studiesdeep learningMRIradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36646444
PMCPMC10809819
OpenAlexW4316928420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.