Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36646399›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pain2023

The Impact of Varied Music Applications on Pain Perception and Situational Pain Catastrophizing.

Carin A Colebaugh, Jenna M Wilson, K Mikayla Flowers, Demario Overstreet, Dan Wang, Robert R Edwards, Peter R Chai, Kristin L Schreiber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06948890 (Effect of Music on Cue Reactivity for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06948890 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Music on Cue Reactivity for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled28ConditionsOpioid Use DisorderArmsMusic intervention, Silence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carin A ColebaughDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: ccolebaugh@bwh.harvard.edu.
Jenna M WilsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
K Mikayla FlowersDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Demario OverstreetDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dan WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Robert R EdwardsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Peter R ChaiDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; The Koch Institute for Integrated Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts; The Fenway Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kristin L SchreiberDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Personalizing Perioperative Preventive Analgesia: Translational Studies Investigating the Biopsychosocial Underpinnings of Enhanced Pain PropensityR35GM128691 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KRISTIN SCHREIBER · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
Smart Steps: A context-aware adherence intervention to improve PrEP adherence among men who have sex with men (MSM) with substance use disorderDP2DA056107 · NIDA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHAI, PETER R · 2022 to 2022
$2.7M
Development of Ingestible Biosensors to Enhance PrEP Adherence in Substance UsersK23DA044874 · NIDA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHAI, PETER R · 2018 to 2022
$1.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA056107NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA044874NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated how pain processing and situational pain catastrophizing differed between 2 music interventions (Unwind and favorite music) and a control condition (white noise). Healthy adults (n = 70) completed quantitative sensory testing (QST) measuring pressure pain threshold (PPTh) and tolerance (PPTol), heat pain threshold (HPTh), offset analgesia (OA), temporal summation of pain (TSP), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Participants completed 3 QST rounds with the presence of white noise (control condition), a relaxing music app (Unwind), and their favorite music, which were presented in a randomized order. The Situational Pain Catastrophizing Scale was completed after each round. Friedman tests and post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare pain processing and catastrophizing across the 3 conditions. Participants' PPTh, PPTol, and HPTh were significantly higher during the favorite music condition compared to the other 2 conditions, indicating lower pain sensitivity when listening to favorite music. In contrast, OA was lower in the favorite music condition. Although TSP and CPM were induced by the QST paradigm, these did not differ across the 3 conditions. Situational pain catastrophizing was also significantly lower during the favorite music condition. Several measures of pain sensitivity and situational pain catastrophizing were lower when listening to favorite music compared to relaxing music or white noise. More research is necessary to determine the mechanism(s) by which music modulates pain processing. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents evidence that participant-chosen favorite music can alter several aspects of nociceptive processing, including catastrophic thinking about pain, compared to white noise or relaxing music. Employing an individual's favorite music during episodic or procedural pain might represent a cost effective adjunctive analgesic strategy.

Indexed as

MusicAdultCatastrophizationHumansPainPain MeasurementPain PerceptionPain Thresholdanalgesiamusicpain catastrophizingPain sensitivityquantitative sensory testing

Identifiers

PMID36646399
PMCPMC10329987
OpenAlexW4316019798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.