ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2023
Cone Structure and Function in RPGR- and USH2A-Associated Retinal Degeneration.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two-year prospective natural history study of EYS-associated retinitis pigmentosa using adaptive optics: the KEYS study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Longitudinal Changes in Optoretinography Provide an Early and Sensitive Biomarker of Outer Retinal Disease.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- The Role of Visual Electrophysiology in Systemic Hereditary Syndromes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pointwise Structure-Function Analysis of the Ellipsoid Zone in Retinitis Pigmentosa Using an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted OCT and Microperimetry Overlay.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare cone structure and function between RPGR- and USH2A-associated retinal degeneration.
designRetrospective, observational, cross-sectional study.
methodsThis multicenter study included 13 eyes (9 participants) with RPGR-related X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (RPGR), 15 eyes (10 participants) with USH2A-related Usher syndrome type 2 (USH2), 16 eyes (9 participants) with USH2A-related autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (ARRP), and 7 normal eyes (6 participants). Structural measures included cone spacing and density from adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and photoreceptor inner segment (IS), outer segment (OS), and outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. OCT angiography images were used to study choriocapillaris flow deficit percent (CCFD). Cone function was assessed by fundus-guided microperimetry. Measures were compared at designated regions using analysis of variance with pairwise comparisons among disease groups, adjusted for disease duration and eccentricity.
resultsOCT segmentation revealed shorter OS and IS, with reduced ONL thickness in RPGR compared to normal (OS: P < .001, IS: P = .001, ONL: P = .005), USH2 (OS: P = .01, IS: P = .03, ONL: P = .03), or ARRP (OS: P = .001, ONL: P = .03). Increased cone spacing was observed in both RPGR (P = .03) and USH2 compared with normal (P = .048). The mean CCFD in RPGR was greater than in USH2 (P = .02). Microperimetry demonstrated below-normal regional sensitivity in RPGR (P = .004), USH2 (P = .02), and ARRP (P = .009), without significant intergroup differences.
conclusionsOuter retinal structure and choriocapillaris perfusion were more abnormal in RPGR- than USH2A-related retinal degenerations, whereas there were no significant differences in below-normal regional sensitivity between each rod-cone degeneration associated with variants in these 2 genes expressed at the photoreceptor-connecting cilium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.