Trial reportThe Lancet. Microbe2023
Probiotic for pathogen-specific Staphylococcus aureus decolonisation in Thailand: a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Microbe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial use guidelines for canine pyoderma by the International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases (ISCAID).Veterinary dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Probiotics alleviate oral microbiota disruptions induced byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Trial
- Perioperative administration of CBM588 in colorectal cancer radical surgery: A single-center, randomized controlled trial.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Trial
- Enhanced antibacterial performance of chili pepper seed protein hydrolysates by high hydrostatic pressure assisted enzymatic hydrolysis onFood chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Review
- A bioelectric dressing improves postderoofing outcomes in hidradenitis suppurativa by microbiome modulation: A split-body, randomized clinical trial.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Article
- A review on antibiotic and non-antibiotic decolonization strategies of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract.Infection · 2026Review
- Systemic translocation ofJournal of virology · 2026Article
- The dual role of the microbiome in chronic wound management.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- [Modulation of the gut microbiome for the eradication of multidrug-resistant pathogens: current approaches and perspectives].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Review
- The Science behind Probiotics: Exploring their Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Microbiome-Targeted Probiotic Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Novel Biological Approach.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Beyond Antibiotics: Therapeutic Strategies Utilizing Probiotics and Bacteriophages Against Drug-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2026Review
- Pathogens as commensals: microbial priming of the immune system and heterologous protection.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026Review
- Targeted isolation of bacteria with potential to competitively exclude Staphylococcus aureus in the upper respiratory tract of pigs.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Effect of probiotics and synbiotics on antimicrobial resistance in frequent infections: a systematic review of clinical trials.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- From cholera to food poisoning: exploring the antidiarrheal activity of a multi-species water-based probiotic product.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Large-scale characterisation of the nasal microbiome redefines Staphylococcus aureus colonisation status.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Leveraging strain competition to address antimicrobial resistance with microbiota therapies.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Activity of lactic acid bacteria against biofilms formed by Staphylococcus aureus strains involved in acute mastitis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDecolonisation is considered a valuable means to reduce Staphylococcus aureus infection rates. However, previous topical strategies targeting the nose or skin had little success, and oral antibiotic-based decolonisation is ill advised because of eradication of the microbiota and development of antibiotic resistance. We previously showed that the probiotic Bacillus subtilis significantly diminished S aureus at the main intestinal colonisation site via specific bacterial interaction in mice; in this study, we tested this probiotic approach to control S aureus colonisation in humans.
methodsWe did a single-centre, phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in adults from the Songkhla region of Thailand who were colonised by S aureus. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) without history of intestinal disease, antibiotic treatment, or hospital admission within the previous 90 days. Participants were excluded if they were pregnant, breastfeeding, taking probiotics, or had diarrhoea. Participants were allocated (1:1) to groups by computer randomisation in blocks of four, and research coordinators were masked to group allocation. Participants received 250 mg of probiotic B subtilis MB40 or placebo once per day for 30 days and S aureus colonisation was determined after the last dose was received. The primary outcome was colonisation by S aureus (continuous, mean decrease in colony-forming-unit count) in the intestine (by faecal counts) and nares (by nasal swabs) after intervention (30-day regimen of B subtilis probiotic). This trial is registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20210128003.
findingsThe trial was done between Jan 29 and June 30, 2021, with enrolment taking place from Jan 29 to April 6, 2021. 115 participants were colonised by S aureus, either in the intestine (n=84), nose (n=50), or both (n=19), and were randomly assigned to treatment (n=55) and placebo groups (n=60). Oral probiotic B subtilis resulted in significant reduction of S aureus in stool (96·8%; p<0·0001) and nose (65·4%; p=0·0002). There were no differences in adverse effects or significant microbiome changes between the intervention and placebo groups.
interpretationB subtilis probiotic eliminated more than 95% of the total S aureus colonising the human body without altering the microbiota. This probiotic strategy offers several key advantages over presently used decolonisation strategies for potential use in people with chronic or long-term risk of S aureus infection. Furthermore, by establishing a defining role of the intestinal colonisation site, our findings call for revisiting fundamental notions about S aureus colonisation.
fundingNational Research Council of Thailand and US National Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.