ReviewSeminars in immunology2023
The evolving biology of cross-presentation.
Review in Seminars in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Priming of CD8Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- ANXA2-mediated Phagocytosis Generates ARAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- mRNA vaccines engage unconventional pathways in CD8Nature · 2026Article
- Conventional type-1 DC density is associated with checkpoint inhibitor response across multiple types of cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Tethered neoantigens from the dead sculpt tumor fate.Nature immunology · 2026Article
- WDFY4-dependent cross-presentation proceeds via a vacuolar antigen-processing route.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Immune Responses of Dendritic Cells to Zoonotic DNA and RNA Viruses.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Shared pathway of WDFY4-dependent cross-presentation of immune complexes by cDC1 and cDC2.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Cross-priming in cancer immunology and immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- Development of Engineered Microparticles for Investigating Enzymatic Degradation of Proteins and Peptides within Phagosomes.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- The contributions of T cell-mediated immunity to protection from vaccine-preventable diseases: A primer.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Review
- Adjuvants forVirulence · 2024Review
- MHC class I-dressing is mediated via phosphatidylserine recognition and is enhanced by polyI:C.iScience · 2024Article
- Recent progress in type 1 classical dendritic cell cross-presentation - cytosolic, vacuolar, or both?Current opinion in immunology · 2023Review
- Channeling antigens to CD8Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Short chain fatty acids prime colorectal cancer cells to activate antitumor immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cross-priming was first recognized in the context of in vivo cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses generated against minor histocompatibility antigens induced by immunization with lymphoid cells. Even though the basis for T cell antigen recognition was still largely unclear at that time, these early studies recognized the implication that such minor histocompatibility antigens were derived from the immunizing cells and were obtained exogenously by the host's antigen presenting cells (APCs) that directly prime the CTL response. As antigen recognition by the T cell receptor became understood to involve peptides derived from antigens processed by the APCs and presented by major histocompatibility molecules, the "cross-priming" phenomenon was subsequently recast as "cross-presentation" and the scope considered for examining this process gradually broadened to include many different forms of antigens, including soluble proteins, and different types of APCs that may not be involved in in vivo CTL priming. Many studies of cross-presentation have relied on in vitro cell models that were recently found to differ from in vivo APCs in particular mechanistic details. A recent trend has focused on the APCs and pathways of cross-presentation used in vivo, especially the type 1 dendritic cells. Current efforts are also being directed towards validating the in vivo role of various putative pathways and gene candidates in cross-presentation garnered from various in vitro studies and to determine the relative contributions they make to CTL responses across various forms of antigens and immunologic settings. Thus, cross-presentation appears to be carried by different pathways in various types of cells for different forms under different physiologic settings, which remain to be evaluated in an in vivo physiologic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.