Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36645993›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunology2023

The evolving biology of cross-presentation.

Ray A Ohara, Kenneth M Murphy

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Priming of CD8Nature neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. ANXA2-mediated Phagocytosis Generates ARAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. WDFY4-dependent cross-presentation proceeds via a vacuolar antigen-processing route.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Adjuvants forVirulence · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Channeling antigens to CD8Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ray A OharaDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Kenneth M MurphyDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: kmurphy@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Molecular Basis of cDC1 DevelopmentR01AI162643 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, KENNETH M · 2022 to 2025
$2.8M
Function of Wdfy4 in cross-presentation and immunityR01AI150297 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, KENNETH M · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
Understanding the Mechanisms of DC Licensing in CD8 T Cell PrimingR01CA248919 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, KENNETH M · 2021 to 2025
$2.3M
Mechanism of c-MYC repression by IRF8 in myeloid lineagesR21AI164142 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, KENNETH M · 2021 to 2022
$433k
Transcriptional basis of embryonic macrophage developmentR21AI163421 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, KENNETH M · 2022 to 2023
$430k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA248919NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150297NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI162643NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI163421NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI164142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-priming was first recognized in the context of in vivo cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses generated against minor histocompatibility antigens induced by immunization with lymphoid cells. Even though the basis for T cell antigen recognition was still largely unclear at that time, these early studies recognized the implication that such minor histocompatibility antigens were derived from the immunizing cells and were obtained exogenously by the host's antigen presenting cells (APCs) that directly prime the CTL response. As antigen recognition by the T cell receptor became understood to involve peptides derived from antigens processed by the APCs and presented by major histocompatibility molecules, the "cross-priming" phenomenon was subsequently recast as "cross-presentation" and the scope considered for examining this process gradually broadened to include many different forms of antigens, including soluble proteins, and different types of APCs that may not be involved in in vivo CTL priming. Many studies of cross-presentation have relied on in vitro cell models that were recently found to differ from in vivo APCs in particular mechanistic details. A recent trend has focused on the APCs and pathways of cross-presentation used in vivo, especially the type 1 dendritic cells. Current efforts are also being directed towards validating the in vivo role of various putative pathways and gene candidates in cross-presentation garnered from various in vitro studies and to determine the relative contributions they make to CTL responses across various forms of antigens and immunologic settings. Thus, cross-presentation appears to be carried by different pathways in various types of cells for different forms under different physiologic settings, which remain to be evaluated in an in vivo physiologic setting.

Indexed as

Antigen-Presenting CellsCross-PrimingAntigen PresentationAntigensBiologyDendritic CellsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansMinor Histocompatibility AntigensT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicAntigensHistocompatibility Antigens Class IMinor Histocompatibility AntigensAntigen processingAntigen uptakeCross-presentationDendritic cellsEndosomes

Identifiers

PMID36645993
PMCPMC10931539
OpenAlexW4316096743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.