Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36645782›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2023

BNT162b2 Effectiveness Against Delta and Omicron Variants of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Adolescents Aged 12-17 Years, by Dosing Interval and Duration.

Iulia G Ionescu, Danuta M Skowronski, Chantal Sauvageau, Erica Chuang, Manale Ouakki, Shinhye Kim, Gaston De Serres

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Globally approved vaccines for COVID-19: a systematic review.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Iulia G IonescuDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Faculty of Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Danuta M SkowronskiImmunization Programs and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Service, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Chantal SauvageauDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Faculty of Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Erica ChuangImmunization Programs and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Service, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Manale OuakkiBiological and Occupational Risks, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Shinhye KimImmunization Programs and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Service, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gaston De SerresDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Faculty of Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Université Laval · CABC Centre for Disease Control · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo- and 3-dose BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, including Delta and Omicron variants, was assessed among adolescents in Canada, where first and second doses were spaced longer than the manufacturer-specified 3-week interval.

methodsTest-negative design estimated VE against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection ≥14 days after vaccination among 12-17-year-olds in Quebec and British Columbia, Canada, between 5 September 2021 and 30 April 2022 (epidemiological weeks 36-17). VE was explored by the interval between first and second doses, time since the second dose, and with a third dose.

resultsThe VE against Delta was ≥90% until at least 5 months after the second dose. The VE against Omicron decreased from about 65%-75% at 2-3 weeks to ≤50% by the third month after vaccination, restored to approximately 65% by a third dose. Although confidence intervals overlapped, VE against Omicron was about 5%-7% higher (absolute) when first and second doses were spaced ≥8 versus 3-4 weeks apart.

conclusionsIn adolescents, 2 BNT162b2 doses provided strong and sustained protection against Delta but reduced and rapidly waning VE against Omicron. A longer interval between first and second doses and a third dose marginally improved Omicron protection.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdolescentBNT162 VaccineBritish ColumbiaHumansBNT162 VaccineadolescentsBNT162b2booster doseCOVID-19 vaccineSARS-CoV-2test-negative designvaccine effectivenessvariants of concern

Identifiers

PMID36645782
PMCPMC10132765
OpenAlexW4316506165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.