Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36645704›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2023

Perioperative Risk Assessment of Patients Using the MyRISK Digital Score Completed Before the Preanesthetic Consultation: Prospective Observational Study.

Fabrice Ferré, Rodolphe Laurent, Philippine Furelau, Emmanuel Doumard, Anne Ferrier, Laetitia Bosch, Cyndie Ba, Rémi Menut, Matt Kurrek, Thomas Geeraerts and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabrice Ferré *Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6648-7454
Rodolphe Laurent *Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-8719
Philippine FurelauDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1713-3232
Emmanuel DoumardInstitut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1185-9630
Anne FerrierDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-3367
Laetitia BoschDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6777-7768
Cyndie BaDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5335-2996
Rémi MenutDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8578-5844
Matt KurrekDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0819-0171
Thomas GeeraertsDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6938-0967
Antoine PiauDépartement de Gériatrie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2849-3057
Vincent MinvilleDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0516-4939
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the potential of digital health solutions to adapt the organization of care in a crisis context.

objectiveOur aim was to describe the relationship between the MyRISK score, derived from self-reported data collected by a chatbot before the preanesthetic consultation, and the occurrence of postoperative complications.

methodsThis was a single-center prospective observational study that included 401 patients. The 16 items composing the MyRISK score were selected using the Delphi method. An algorithm was used to stratify patients with low (green), intermediate (orange), and high (red) risk. The primary end point concerned postoperative complications occurring in the first 6 months after surgery (composite criterion), collected by telephone and by consulting the electronic medical database. A logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify the explanatory variables associated with the complications. A machine learning model was trained to predict the MyRISK score using a larger data set of 1823 patients classified as green or red to reclassify individuals classified as orange as either modified green or modified red. User satisfaction and usability were assessed.

resultsOf the 389 patients analyzed for the primary end point, 16 (4.1%) experienced a postoperative complication. A red score was independently associated with postoperative complications (odds ratio 5.9, 95% CI 1.5-22.3; P=.009). A modified red score was strongly correlated with postoperative complications (odds ratio 21.8, 95% CI 2.8-171.5; P=.003) and predicted postoperative complications with high sensitivity (94%) and high negative predictive value (99%) but with low specificity (49%) and very low positive predictive value (7%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.71). Patient satisfaction numeric rating scale and system usability scale median scores were 8.0 (IQR 7.0-9.0) out of 10 and 90.0 (IQR 82.5-95.0) out of 100, respectively.

conclusionsThe MyRISK digital perioperative risk score established before the preanesthetic consultation was independently associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. Its negative predictive strength was increased using a machine learning model to reclassify patients identified as being at intermediate risk. This reliable numerical categorization could be used to objectively refer patients with low risk to teleconsultation.

Indexed as

chatbotdigital healthmachine learningmobile phoneperioperative riskpreanesthetic consultation

Identifiers

PMID36645704
PMCPMC9887512
OpenAlexW4293063282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.