ArticleAdvances in therapy2023
Examining Real-World Adherence to Nusinersen for the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Using Two Large US Data Sources.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world evidence on nusinersen treatment of persons with SMA: a focused review.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Administration practice and adherence of nusinersen in adults with 5q-spinal muscular atrophy in China: an ambispective multicenter study.BMC neurology · 2026Observational
- Real-world phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer treatment patterns in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a claims-based analysis.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
- Administration practices of and adherence to nusinersen in children with spinal muscular atrophy: a multicenter disease registry study in China.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Risdiplam utilization, adherence, and associated health care costs for patients with spinal muscular atrophy: a United States retrospective claims database analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Clinical perspectives: Treating spinal muscular atrophy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Review
- Adherence and Persistence Among Risdiplam-Treated Individuals with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Retrospective Claims Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disease characterized by progressive muscular atrophy and weakness. Nusinersen was the first treatment approved for SMA. Per the US label, the nusinersen administration schedule consists of three loading doses at 14-day intervals, a fourth loading dose 30 days later, and maintenance doses every 4 months thereafter. Using two large US databases, we evaluated real-world adherence to nusinersen with its unique dosing schedule among generalizable populations of patients with SMA.
methodsPatients with SMA treated with nusinersen, likely to have complete information on date of treatment initiation, were identified in the Optum
resultsTotals of 67 and 291 patients were identified in the EHR and claims databases, respectively. Most nusinersen doses were received on time (93.9% EHR, 80.5% claims). Adherence was higher during the maintenance phase (90.6%) than the loading phase (71.1%) in the claims analysis, in contrast with the EHR analysis (95.5% and 92.6%, respectively), suggesting that not all loading doses of nusinersen may be accurately captured in claims. Inter-dose intervals captured in both databases aligned with the expected dosing schedule.
conclusionMost nusinersen doses were received on time, consistent with the recommended schedule. Our findings also highlight the importance of careful methodological approaches when using real-world administrative databases for evaluation of nusinersen treatment patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.