Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36645531›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2023

Development and validation of a multivariable model predicting the required catheter dwell time among mechanically ventilated critically ill patients in three randomized trials.

Jeanne Iachkine, Niccolò Buetti, Harm-Jan de Grooth, Anaïs R Briant, Olivier Mimoz, Bruno Mégarbane, Jean-Paul Mira, Xavier Valette, Cédric Daubin, Damien du Cheyron and 3 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01189682 phase4completednot on this map

Impact of Tegaderm HP and Tegaderm CHG in Major Catheter Related Infections and Dressing Detachment in ICU Patients a Prospective Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2010 to 2011Enrolled1,960ConditionsCatheter-Related InfectionsArmsTegaderm, Tegaderm HP, Tegaderm CHG
NCT01479153 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Subclavian, Femoral and Internal Jugular Venous Catheterization in Term of Complications in the Intensive Care Unit: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, CaenRan2011 to 2015Enrolled3,471ConditionsCritical Care, Catheterization, ICUArmsRandomization of the site for catheterization
NCT01629550 phase4completednot on this map

Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial of 4 Antiseptic Strategies for Prevention of Catheter Infection in Intensive Care Unit for Adults Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoitiers University HospitalRan2012Enrolled2,400ConditionsPreventing Catheter Related InfectionArmsskin disinfection prior catheter insertion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jeanne IachkineDepartment of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Caen University Hospital and Caen Normandy University, Caen, France.
Niccolò BuettiInfection Control Program and World Health Organization Collaborating Center on Patient Safety, Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Harm-Jan de GroothDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anaïs R BriantDepartment of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Caen University Hospital and Caen Normandy University, Caen, France.
Olivier MimozInserm U1070, Poitiers University, Poitiers, France.
Bruno MégarbaneMedical and Toxicological Intensive Care Unit, Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, INSERM, UMRS-1144, Paris University, Paris, France.
Jean-Paul MiraMedical ICU, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014, Paris, France.
Xavier ValetteDepartment of Medical Intensive Care, Caen University Hospital, 14000, Caen, France.
Cédric DaubinDepartment of Medical Intensive Care, Caen University Hospital, 14000, Caen, France.
Damien du CheyronDepartment of Medical Intensive Care, Caen University Hospital, 14000, Caen, France.
Leonard A MermelDepartment of Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, Lifespan Hospital System, Providence, RI, USA.
Jean-François TimsitMedical and Infectious Diseases ICU (MI2), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, IAME, INSERM U1137, Paris, France.
Jean-Jacques ParientiDepartment of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Caen University Hospital and Caen Normandy University, Caen, France. parienti-jj@chu-caen.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-5590
Inserm · FRUniversité de Caen Normandie · FRAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLBrown University · USHôpital Cochin · FRUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anatomic site for central venous catheter insertion influences the risk of central venous catheter-related intravascular complications. We developed and validated a predictive score of required catheter dwell time to identify critically ill patients at higher risk of intravascular complications.

methodsWe retrospectively conducted a cohort study from three multicenter randomized controlled trials enrolling consecutive patients requiring central venous catheterization. The primary outcome was the required catheter dwell time, defined as the period between the first catheter insertion and removal of the last catheter for absence of utility. Predictors were identified in the training cohort (3SITES trial; 2336 patients) through multivariable analyses based on the subdistribution hazard function accounting for death as a competing event. Internal validation was performed in the training cohort by 500 bootstraps to derive the CVC-IN score from robust risk factors. External validation of the CVC-IN score were performed in the testing cohort (CLEAN, and DRESSING2; 2371 patients).

resultsThe analysis was restricted to patients requiring mechanical ventilation to comply with model assumptions. Immunosuppression (2 points), high creatinine > 100 micromol/L (2 points), use of vasopressor (1 point), obesity (1 point) and older age (40-59, 1 point; ≥ 60, 2 points) were independently associated with the required catheter dwell time. At day 28, area under the ROC curve for the CVC-IN score was 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.66-0.72] in the training cohort and 0.64, 95% CI [0.61-0.66] in the testing cohort. Patients with a CVC-IN score ≥ 4 in the overall cohort had a median required catheter dwell time of 24 days (versus 11 days for CVC-IN score < 4 points). The positive predictive value of a CVC-IN score ≥ 4 was 76.9% for > 7 days required catheter dwell time in the testing cohort.

conclusionThe CVC-IN score, which can be used for the first catheter, had a modest ability to discriminate required catheter dwell time. Nevertheless, preference of the subclavian site may contribute to limit the risk of intravascular complications, in particular among ventilated patients with high CVC-IN score. Trials Registration NCT01479153, NCT01629550, NCT01189682.

Indexed as

Catheter dwell timeCentral venous cathetersCritical careIntensive care unitPredictive score

Identifiers

PMID36645531
PMCPMC9842826
OpenAlexW4316663560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.