Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36645507›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

Multi-modal artificial intelligence for the combination of automated 3D breast ultrasound and mammograms in a population of women with predominantly dense breasts.

Tao Tan, Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz, Tianyu Zhang, Lin Xu, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Yingzhao Shen, Nico Karssemeijer, Jun Xu, Ritse M Mann, Lingyun Bao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Tao Tan *Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz *ScreenPoint Medical, 6525 EC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tianyu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lin XuSchool of Information Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China.
Regina G H Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yingzhao ShenAffiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Xueshi Road, Hubin Street, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang, China.
Nico KarssemeijerDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jun XuInstitute for AI in Medicine, School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China.
Ritse M MannDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lingyun BaoAffiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Xueshi Road, Hubin Street, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang, China. hzs1bly@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-6690
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLHangzhou First People's Hospital · CNRadboud University Nijmegen · NLNanjing University of Information Science and Technology · CNShanghaiTech University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the stand-alone and combined performance of artificial intelligence (AI) detection systems for digital mammography (DM) and automated 3D breast ultrasound (ABUS) in detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts.

methods430 paired cases of DM and ABUS examinations from a Asian population with dense breasts were retrospectively collected. All cases were analyzed by two AI systems, one for DM exams and one for ABUS exams. A selected subset (n = 152) was read by four radiologists. The performance of AI systems was based on analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The maximum Youden's index and its associated sensitivity and specificity were also reported for each AI systems. Detection performance of human readers in the subcohort of the reader study was measured in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

resultsThe performance of the AI systems in a multi-modal setting was significantly better when the weights of AI-DM and AI-ABUS were 0.25 and 0.75, respectively, than each system individually in a single-modal setting (AUC-AI-Multimodal = 0.865; AUC-AI-DM = 0.832, p = 0.026; AUC-AI-ABUS = 0.841, p = 0.041). The maximum Youden's index for AI-Multimodal was 0.707 (sensitivity = 79.4%, specificity = 91.2%). In the subcohort that underwent human reading, the panel of four readers achieved a sensitivity of 93.2% and specificity of 32.7%. AI-multimodal achieves superior or equal sensitivity as single human readers at the same specificity operating points on the ROC curve.

conclusionMultimodal (ABUS + DM) AI systems for detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts are a potential solution for breast screening in radiologist-scarce regions.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAutomated 3D breast ultrasoundBreast cancerDeep learningMammography

Identifiers

PMID36645507
PMCPMC9842825
OpenAlexW4316494561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.