ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Anatomical risk factors for aseptic loosening of full hinge knee prosthesis in primary and revision TKAs.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel radiological classification of the distal humerus: morphometric analysis across two European populations.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Is there a correlation between distal femur anatomy and bone mineral density measurements?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Unbalanced metaphyseal fixation is associated with an increased aseptic loosening of revision total knee arthroplasty at mean 4-year follow-up.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Assessing the impact of distal femoral morphology using Citak's ratio: an independent risk factor for aseptic loosening in rotating hinge knee prosthesis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRisk factors (RF) associated with aseptic loosening (AL) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are poorly understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the anatomical shape variations in relation to the inner-diameter of the femur and the tibia as prognostic RF for AL of full hinge prosthesis (FHP) in primary and revision TKA. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively examined all patients, who underwent revision surgery (2003-2018) due to AL of the FHP in primary (n = 38) and revision TKA (n = 46). Diagnosis-appropriate controls without AL at minimum follow-up of 24 months were randomly collected for each group. Besides other risk factors, we also measured the inner diameter of the femur according to the Citak classification and of the tibia on anteroposterior radiographies.
resultsRF for AL are younger age in primary and revision as well as > 1 previous surgeries in revision TKA. The femoral index was shown to be a RF for AL in revision TKA (p = 0.001), but not in primary TKA. The novel tibial index was associated with AL in primary with AUC 0.776 (95% CI 0.67, 0.88), 65.8% sensitivity, 86.6% specificity and in revision TKA with AUC 0.817 (95% CI 0.73, 0.91), 82.6% sensitivity and 71.7% specificity.
conclusionThis is the first study to calculate the tibial measurements and the tibial index according to Citak et al. and to identify them as prognostic RF for AL of the full hinge knee prosthesis in TKA and confirm the femoral index as a RF for AL also in revision full hinge knee prosthesis. Therefore, the preoperative radiological evaluation should include the analysis of the anatomical shape variants in order to select the appropriate prosthesis design with a possibly enhanced prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.