ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2023
Incidence of de novo stress urinary incontinence following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urinary Outcomes Following a Novel Reconstructive Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse with Concomitant Short Total Vaginal Length and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Mesh Sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Complications After Vaginal Vault Suspension: A Nationwide Cohort Study Comparing Six Apical Procedures.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Effect of Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- De-Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence After Apical Prolapse Surgery: Potential Link with the Zone of Critical Elasticity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Mid-Term Efficacy Evaluation of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy vs Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in stress-continent women following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy without an anti-incontinence procedure.
methodsWe completed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without concurrent anti-incontinence procedures from October 2006 through January 2021.
resultsOf the 169 women who underwent minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, 17.1% (n=30) developed de novo SUI, and 7.1% eventually underwent a midurethral sling placement. On logistic regression, BMI, preoperative urinary urgency, and history of transvaginal mesh repair were found to be significantly associated with and predictive of de novo SUI. When the concordance index (C-index) was calculated with the model published by Jelovsek et al. for women who developed de novo SUI within 12 months of the prolapse surgery, the current de novo SUI calculator was able to discriminate de novo SUI outcome (C-index = 0.71).
conclusionsThe incidence of de novo SUI after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy without anti-incontinence procedure correlates directly with higher BMI, preoperative urinary urgency, and transvaginal mesh history for POP. Preoperative counseling for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy should include discussing the risk of de novo SUI and preoperative factors that may increase this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.