ArticleBioscience reports2023
Development and validation of novel automatable assay for cholesterol efflux capacity.
Article in Bioscience reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association between cholesterol efflux capacity and apolipoprotein A1: systematic review and meta-analysis.Biochemia medica · 2025Pooled it
- Characterization and response to exercise training of HDL-specific phospholipid efflux.Journal of lipid research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the past decade, evaluation of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) functionality has been well studied for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is the strongest candidate as the biomarker out of various HDL antiatherosclerotic functions. However, CEC has not yet been introduced clinically because of several technical issues, including the use of radioactive materials and differentiated cells in the assay. Previously, our laboratory developed a radioisotope- and cell-free CEC assay called the immobilized liposome-bound gel beads (ILGs) method to replace the conventional method. However, the separation process of the supernatant was not suitable for installation in an automatic analyzer. The present study aims to develop a new method that is easier to operate. We assumed that the use of magnetic beads instead of gel beads would enable the skip of the centrifugal process. First, similar to the ILG method, porous magnetic beads were treated with liposomes containing fluorescently labeled cholesterol. Fluorescence was observed inside the magnetic beads, and almost the same amount of liposomes as in the ILG method was immobilized successfully. These immobilized liposome-bound magnetic beads (ILMs) were available for CEC assay when HDL and apolipoprotein B-100-depleted serum (BDS) were used as cholesterol acceptors. The ILM method showed sufficient basic performance and a good correlation with the ILG method. Furthermore, when the CEC of 15 serum samples from healthy subjects was measured, a good correlation between HDL-cholesterol level and the ILG method was confirmed. Thus, it was confirmed that the ILM method was successfully developed and could be automated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.