Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36645398›Full record

ReviewPathologica2022

What's new in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours?

Reza Alaghehbandan, Farshid Siadat, Kiril Trpkov

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Reza AlaghehbandanRobert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Farshid SiadatCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Precision Laboratories, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kiril TrpkovCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Precision Laboratories, Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Calgary · CACleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 classification of urinary and male genital tumours (5th edition) has significantly improved our understanding of the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of renal tumours. The aim of this review is to outline the most important changes and diagnostic updates in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours. A major change in this edition is the grouping of renal tumours into broader categories that include "

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansKidneyWorld Health Organizationclassificationkidneypathologyrenal cell carcinomaWHO

Identifiers

PMID36645398
PMCPMC10342217
OpenAlexW4316495391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.