Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36645397›Full record

ReviewPathologica2022

WHO 2022 Classification of Kidney Tumors: what is relevant? An update and future novelties for the pathologist.

Anna Caliò, Stefano Marletta, Matteo Brunelli, Guido Martignoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. SpecificTheranostics · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna CaliòDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Italy.
Stefano MarlettaDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Italy.
Matteo BrunelliDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Italy.
Guido MartignoniDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification systems reflect our technical abilities in the investigation of tumors and our current theories on tumor development. Herein, by providing a historical perspective on the evolution of classifying renal tumors, we assess the current WHO classification highlighting the novelties and the implications of these changes in daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansPathologistsWorld Health Organizationclassificationclinical relevancemanagementmolecularrenal cell carcinomatherapyWHO

Identifiers

PMID36645397
PMCPMC10342215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.