Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36645380›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2023

Impact of Phylogenetic Tree Completeness and Mis-specification of Sampling Fractions on Trait Dependent Diversification Models.

Poppy Mynard, Adam C Algar, Lesley T Lancaster, Greta Bocedi, Fahri Fahri, Cécile Gubry-Rangin, Pungki Lupiyaningdyah, Meis Nangoy, Owen G Osborne, Alexander S T Papadopulos and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Challenges in estimating species' age from phylogenetic trees.Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Poppy MynardSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0763-3364
Adam C AlgarDepartment of Biology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.
Lesley T LancasterSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Greta BocediSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Fahri FahriDepartment of Biology, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia.
Cécile Gubry-RanginSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Pungki LupiyaningdyahMuseum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia.
Meis NangoyFaculty of Animal Husbandry, Sam Ratulangi University, Kampus Bahu Street, Manado 95115, Indonesia.
Owen G OsborneSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Environment Centre Wales, Deiniol Road, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1213-1169
Alexander S T PapadopulosSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Environment Centre Wales, Deiniol Road, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK.
I Made SudianaMicrobial Ecology Research Group, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Cibinong 19611, Indonesia.
Berry JuliandiDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia.
Justin M J TravisSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Leonel Herrera-AlsinaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0474-3592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the origins of diversity and the factors that drive some clades to be more diverse than others are important issues in evolutionary biology. Sophisticated SSE (state-dependent speciation and extinction) models provide insights into the association between diversification rates and the evolution of a trait. The empirical data used in SSE models and other methods is normally imperfect, yet little is known about how this can affect these models. Here, we evaluate the impact of common phylogenetic issues on inferences drawn from SSE models. Using simulated phylogenetic trees and trait information, we fitted SSE models to determine the effects of sampling fraction (phylogenetic tree completeness) and sampling fraction mis-specification on model selection and parameter estimation (speciation, extinction, and transition rates) under two sampling regimes (random and taxonomically biased). As expected, we found that both model selection and parameter estimate accuracies are reduced at lower sampling fractions (i.e., low tree completeness). Furthermore, when sampling of the tree is imbalanced across sub-clades and tree completeness is ≤ 60%, rates of false positives increase and parameter estimates are less accurate, compared to when sampling is random. Thus, when applying SSE methods to empirical datasets, there are increased risks of false inferences of trait dependent diversification when some sub-clades are heavily under-sampled. Mis-specifying the sampling fraction severely affected the accuracy of parameter estimates: parameter values were over-estimated when the sampling fraction was specified as lower than its true value, and under-estimated when the sampling fraction was specified as higher than its true value. Our results suggest that it is better to cautiously under-estimate sampling efforts, as false positives increased when the sampling fraction was over-estimated. We encourage SSE studies where the sampling fraction can be reasonably estimated and provide recommended best practices for SSE modeling. [Trait dependent diversification; SSE models; phylogenetic tree completeness; sampling fraction.].

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationPhenotypePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID36645380
PMCPMC10198648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.