Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36645189›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Estimating copy number to determine BRCA2 deletion status and to expect prognosis in localized prostate cancer.

Takuhisa Nukaya, Makoto Sumitomo, Eiji Sugihara, Mayu Takeda, Sachio Nohara, Shigeki Tanishima, Masashi Takenaka, Kenji Zennami, Kiyoshi Takahara, Ryoichi Shiroki and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Identification ofOncology research · 2026
    Article
  4. Impact ofFujita medical journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Acquisition ofJTO clinical and research reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Droplet Digital PCR Improves Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Takuhisa NukayaFujita Cancer Center, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Makoto SumitomoFujita Cancer Center, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2589-922X
Eiji SugiharaFujita Cancer Center, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Mayu TakedaFujita Cancer Center, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Sachio NoharaDepartment of Bio Informatics, Communication Engineering Center, Electronic System Business Group, Mitsubishi Electric Software Corp, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeki TanishimaDepartment of Bio Informatics, Communication Engineering Center, Electronic System Business Group, Mitsubishi Electric Software Corp, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi TakenakaDepartment of Urology School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Kenji ZennamiDepartment of Urology School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Kiyoshi TakaharaDepartment of Urology School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Ryoichi ShirokiDepartment of Urology School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Hideyuki SayaFujita Cancer Center, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Fujita Health University · JPMitsubishi Electric (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe significance of BRCA alterations has been implicated in the development of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PC). The details of the frequency and significance of BRCA alterations in localized PC remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the frequency and clinical significance of BRCA alterations in localized PCs using an in-house next-generation sequencer (NGS) system.

methodsDNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of surgical specimens from 126 patients with clinically localized PC who underwent radical prostatectomy. The mutation information of 164 cancer genes was analyzed using the PleSSision-Rapid test. Both copy number (CN) variation and loss of heterozygosity of various genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, were estimated and reported.

resultsNext-generation sequencer analyses revealed that the BRCA2 CN was decreased in 17 patients (13.5%) and the BRCA1 CN in six (4.8%) patients. NGS-based CN values were shown to be highly correlated with droplet digital PCR-based CN values. Tissue-specific BRCA expression investigated using the Human Protein Atlas showed that the decreased CN of BRCA2, but not BRCA1, is responsible for the decreased BRCA activity in PC. Ten of the 22 patients with decreased BRCA2 CN were presumed to have somatic heterozygous deletion. There were no observed associations between the heterozygous deletion of BRCA2 and various clinicopathological parameters. Furthermore, three of 10 patients developed biochemical recurrence within 3 months after surgery. Multivariate analyses revealed that the initial prostate-specific antigen levels and BRCA2 CN were independent factors for biochemical recurrence.

conclusionOur results suggest that a decrease in BRCA2 CN may be used as a biomarker for predicting recurrence after surgery in localized PC. Early screening for somatic alterations in BRCA2 using NGS may help to broadly predict the risk of PC progression.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsProstatic NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinGenes, BRCA2Germ-Line MutationHumansMaleMutationPrognosisBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA2copy numberloss of heterozygosityprognostic valueprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID36645189
PMCPMC10134377
OpenAlexW4316469299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.