Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36645032›Full record

Trial reportThe International journal of social psychiatry2023

Predictors of engagement with peer support: analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial of one-to-one peer support for discharge from inpatient psychiatric care.

Sarah White, Rahul Bhattacharya, Stephen Bremner, Alison Faulkner, Rhiannon Foster, Sarah Gibson, Lucy Goldsmith, Daniella Harnett, Mike Lucock, Akshaykumar Patel and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The International journal of social psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah WhiteSt George's, University of London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2468-6193
Rahul BhattacharyaEast London NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Stephen BremnerBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, UK.
Alison FaulknerIndependent Survivor Researcher, London, UK.
Rhiannon FosterCity, University of London, UK.
Sarah GibsonIndependent Survivor Researcher, London, UK.
Lucy GoldsmithSt George's, University of London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6934-1925
Daniella HarnettEast London NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Mike LucockUniversity of Huddersfield, UK.
Akshaykumar PatelQueen Mary, University of London, UK.
Stefan PriebeQueen Mary, University of London, UK.
Julie RepperImplementing Recovery through Organisational Change, Nottingham, UK.
Miles RinaldiSouth West London & St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, UK.
Anthony SallaCity, University of London, UK.
Alan SimpsonKings' College London, UK.
Michael UssherSt George's, University of London, UK.
Steve GillardCity, University of London, UK.
City, University of London · GBEast London NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBSt George's, University of London · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBKing's College London · GBSouth West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Huddersfield · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA range of evidence for the effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services is emerging. Levels of engagement with peer support vary with limited studies showing few individual participant characteristics predicting engagement. Implementation factors that might predict engagement have not been considered.

methodsData were analysed from the intervention arm of the ENRICH trial of one-to-one peer support for discharge from acute psychiatric inpatient care. Two outcomes were considered: (1) a measure of 'engaged with peer worker'; (2) number of face-to-face contacts with peer worker post-discharge. Two sets of independent variables were analysed against each outcome: (1) pre-randomisation participant characteristics; (2) implementation factors measured pre-discharge. Analyses used logistic and zero-inflated negative binomial regression models according to outcome structure.

resultsData were analysed for 265 participants randomised to peer support who had a known peer worker. Non-heterosexual participants had increased odds of engaging with peer support compared to heterosexual participants,

conclusionsImplementation of peer support should include a focus on relationship building in the first session of peer support. The potential for peer support to break down barriers to accessing mental health services experienced by people from marginalised communities warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPatient DischargeAftercareCounselingHumansInpatientsengagementmental health servicesPeer supportsecondary analysis

Identifiers

PMID36645032
PMCPMC10240623
OpenAlexW4316466944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.