Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644818›Full record

SynthesisJournal of genetic counseling2023

Attitudes and beliefs regarding race-targeted genetic testing of Black people: A systematic review.

Ana S Iltis, Liz Rolf, Lauren Yaeger, Melody S Goodman, James M DuBois

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of genetic counseling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and predictive testing preferences for breast cancer treatment side effects.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Kidney medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana S IltisWake Forest University.ORCID 0000-0003-0624-3022
Liz RolfWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0003-4900-3133
Lauren YaegerWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0003-1806-0418
Melody S GoodmanNew York University School of Global Public Health.ORCID 0000-0001-8932-624X
James M DuBoisWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-3712-7051
Washington University in St. Louis · USNew York University · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Identifying and exploring solutions to the ethical challenges of ApoL1 testing of donors with recent African ancestry through mixed methods research with stakeholdersR01MD014161 · NIMHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DUBOIS, JAMES M, MOHAN, SUMIT · 2019 to 2021
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002345NIMHD NIH HHS 1R01MD014161NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD014161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geographical ancestry has been associated with an increased risk of various genetic conditions. Race and ethnicity often have been used as proxies for geographical ancestry. Despite numerous problems associated with the crude reliance on race and ethnicity as proxies for geographical ancestry, some genetic testing in the clinical, research, and employment settings has been and continues to be race- or ethnicity-based. Race-based or race-targeted genetic testing refers to genetic testing offered only or primarily to people of particular racial or ethnic groups because of presumed differences among groups. One current example is APOL1 testing of Black kidney donors. Race-based genetic testing raises numerous ethical and policy questions. Given the ongoing reliance on the Black race in genetic testing, it is important to understand the views of people who identify as Black or are identified as Black (including African American, Afro-Caribbean, and Hispanic Black) regarding race-based genetic testing that targets Black people because of their race. We conducted a systematic review of studies and reports of stakeholder-engaged projects that examined how people who identify as or are identified as Black perceive genetic testing that specifically presumes genetic differences exist among racial groups or uses race as a surrogate for ancestral genetic variation and targets Black people. Our review identified 14 studies that explicitly studied this question and another 13 that implicitly or tacitly studied this matter. We found four main factors that contribute to a positive attitude toward race-targeted genetic testing (facilitators) and eight main factors that are associated with concerns regarding race-targeted genetic testing (barriers). This review fills an important gap. These findings should inform future genetic research and the policies and practices developed in clinical, research, public health, or other settings regarding genetic testing.

Indexed as

Black PeopleEthnicityGenetic TestingApolipoprotein L1AttitudeBlack or African AmericanHumansAPOL1 protein, humanApolipoprotein L1African AmericanAfrican ancestryattitudesBlackdiscriminationdisparitiesELSIethicsgenetic screeninggenetic testingracestigmaunderrepresented populations

Identifiers

PMID36644818
PMCPMC10349658
OpenAlexW4316464400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.