SynthesisJournal of genetic counseling2023
Attitudes and beliefs regarding race-targeted genetic testing of Black people: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of genetic counseling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breaking barriers to completing genetic testing for inherited breast cancer among at-risk Black women using a community-based participatory research approach.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Public Perception of Genetic Research on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.Behavior genetics · 2026Article
- Insights From Black Living Kidney Donors: An Interview Study on APOL1 Genetic Testing Experiences.Clinical transplantation · 2026Observational
- Beyond the test: patient-reported concerns and worries regarding kidney conditions andFrontiers in nephrology · 2026Article
- Unveiling Disparities: Analyzing Hispanic Inclusion in Liver Cancer Research Databases in the United States.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Prevalence and predictive testing preferences for breast cancer treatment side effects.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Underrepresented populations in genomic research: a qualitative study of researchers' perspectives.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Religious factors predict support for genomic medicine more strongly than politics, education, or trust: A survey of 4,939 adults in the United States.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Engaging communities: A scoping literature review of community-based participatory research in genetics service delivery settings.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- Biospecimens in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study: Rationale and protocol.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- A proposal for an inclusive working definition of genetic discrimination to promote a more coherent debate.Nature genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Geographical ancestry has been associated with an increased risk of various genetic conditions. Race and ethnicity often have been used as proxies for geographical ancestry. Despite numerous problems associated with the crude reliance on race and ethnicity as proxies for geographical ancestry, some genetic testing in the clinical, research, and employment settings has been and continues to be race- or ethnicity-based. Race-based or race-targeted genetic testing refers to genetic testing offered only or primarily to people of particular racial or ethnic groups because of presumed differences among groups. One current example is APOL1 testing of Black kidney donors. Race-based genetic testing raises numerous ethical and policy questions. Given the ongoing reliance on the Black race in genetic testing, it is important to understand the views of people who identify as Black or are identified as Black (including African American, Afro-Caribbean, and Hispanic Black) regarding race-based genetic testing that targets Black people because of their race. We conducted a systematic review of studies and reports of stakeholder-engaged projects that examined how people who identify as or are identified as Black perceive genetic testing that specifically presumes genetic differences exist among racial groups or uses race as a surrogate for ancestral genetic variation and targets Black people. Our review identified 14 studies that explicitly studied this question and another 13 that implicitly or tacitly studied this matter. We found four main factors that contribute to a positive attitude toward race-targeted genetic testing (facilitators) and eight main factors that are associated with concerns regarding race-targeted genetic testing (barriers). This review fills an important gap. These findings should inform future genetic research and the policies and practices developed in clinical, research, public health, or other settings regarding genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.