Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644742›Full record

ArticleHospital pharmacy2023

Application of Pharmacogenomics Testing in a Community-based Facility.

Jingyi Wang, Sue Paul, Renee Noel Arbet, Alex C Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hospital pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingyi WangUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8958-6041
Sue PaulSyneRxgy Consulting, LLC., Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Renee Noel ArbetMain Line Health - Riddle Hospital, Media, PA, USA.
Alex C LinUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the use of pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing in a community-based facility, the adoption of the PGx recommendations by providers, and assess challenges and opportunities for pharmacists in using PGx testing in a real-world setting. This was a retrospective study involving chart reviews of 137 patients with mood disorders who underwent PGx testing between September 2017 and December 2017. Eighty-seven patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed to evaluate the impact of PGx testing on psychotropic medication treatment and to evaluate the PGx test process. PGx test results were used by providers to guide their therapeutic modifications based on the gene-drug interactions identified. Patient medication use increased from 125 to 190 (

Indexed as

clinical pathwaysgene therapypsychiatric

Identifiers

PMID36644742
PMCPMC9837320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.