ArticleHospital pharmacy2023
A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Use of Probiotics for the Prevention of Hospital-Onset
Article in Hospital pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Guidance and Practical Recommendations for Probiotic Use in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Functional Constipation, andJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Review
- Clinical guidance and practical recommendations for probiotic use in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, and Clostridioides difficile infection considering sex-based differences: a Korean translation.Ewha medical journal · 2026Article
- A Systematic Literature Review on Risk Factors for and Timing of Clostridioides difficile Infection in the United States.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Exposure to antimicrobials is a known risk factor for Objective: To evaluate the rates of hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI) among patients who received intravenous (IV) antibiotics plus probiotics versus IV antibiotics alone. Design: Retrospective, single-center cohort study. Methods: We included adult patients that received at least 1 dose of IV antibiotics and had a hospital length of stay of at least 3 days between August 2017 and July 2020. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts, either receipt of probiotics or non-receipt of probiotics. Patients with positive Results: We identified 17 598 patients that received IV antibiotics alone and 2659 patients received IV antibiotics plus probiotics. HO-CDI occurred in 46 (0.26%) of those that received antibiotics alone compared to 5 (0.19%) of those that received probiotics with IV antibiotics (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28-1.81). ICU admission (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.02-3.19) and history of CDI (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.07-10.97) in the past 12 months were associated with a higher incidence of HO-CDI. Conclusion: The addition of probiotics did not reduce the incidence of HO-CDI among inpatients receiving IV antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.