Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644636›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Development and validation of a radiogenomics model to predict axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer integrating MRI with transcriptome data: A multicohort study.

Huifang Chen, Xiaosong Lan, Tao Yu, Lan Li, Sun Tang, Shuling Liu, Fujie Jiang, Lu Wang, Yao Huang, Ying Cao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The impact of radiogenomics on breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Huifang ChenDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Xiaosong LanDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Tao YuDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Lan LiDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Sun TangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Shuling LiuDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Fujie JiangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Lu WangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Yao HuangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Ying CaoDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Xiaoxia WangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Jiuquan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To develop and validate a radiogenomics model for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in breast cancer compared to a genomics and radiomics model. Methods: This retrospective study integrated transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas with matched MRI data from The Cancer Imaging Archive for the same set of 111 patients with breast cancer, which were used as the training and testing groups. Fifteen patients from one hospital were enrolled as the external validation group. Radiomics features were extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI of breast cancer, and genomics features were derived from differentially expressed gene analysis of transcriptome data. Boruta was used for genomics and radiomics data dimension reduction and feature selection. Logistic regression was applied to develop genomics, radiomics, and radiogenomics models to predict ALNM. The performance of the three models was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves and compared by the Results: The genomics model was established by nine genomics features, and the radiomics model was established by three radiomics features. The two models showed good discrimination performance in predicting ALNM in breast cancer, with areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.80, 0.67, and 0.52 for the genomics model and 0.72, 0.68, and 0.71 for the radiomics model in the training, testing and external validation groups, respectively. The radiogenomics model integrated with five genomics features and three radiomics features had a better performance, with AUCs of 0.84, 0.75, and 0.82 in the three groups, respectively, which was higher than the AUC of the radiomics model in the training group and the genomics model in the external validation group (both Conclusion: The radiogenomics model combining radiomics features and genomics features improved the performance to predict ALNM in breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancergenomicslymph node metastasisradiogenomicsradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36644636
PMCPMC9837803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.