Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644567›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023

Comparison and Validation of Different Risk Assessment Models in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism During Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Retrospective Study in China.

Yanqin Lian, Jia Li, Weizhang Liang, Mei Zhong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk Stratification and Safety Profile of Pharmacological Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Postpartum Women Following Cesarean Section: A Comparative Evaluation.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanqin Lian *Department of Operating Room, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Jia Li *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0188-1869
Weizhang LiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Mei ZhongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes maternal mortality and morbidity. This study compares the predictive performance of three risk assessment models (Caprini model, Wells Score, and RCOG model) for VTE risk in Chinese patients during pregnancy and postpartum. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University and the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2003 to January 2022. Patients were risk-classified using the three risk assessment models, and the models were evaluated for accuracy. Results: A total of 302 patients with confirmed VTE during pregnancy and postpartum were identified. Of these, 142 (47.0%) were diagnosed during pregnancy and 160 (53.0%) postpartum. A total of 276 (91.4%) patients had DVT only, 14 (4.6%) had PE only, and 12 (4.0%) were diagnosed with both. Of the 142 antepartum patients, 140 were categorized at moderate or above-risk levels by the Caprini model, 134 in the Wells Score model, and 112 in the RCOG model, respectively. The number of postpartum patients at moderate or above-risk levels identified by the Caprini, Wells Score, and RCOG models were 160, 152, and 118. The Caprini model significantly stratified VTE patients into a moderate or high-risk level ( Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the Caprini model is an effective prediction tool for the maternal population during peripartum, especially in the postpartum period. Results from the Caprini model will help obstetricians or physicians stratify potential risk patients and guide prophylaxis decisions. The RCOG model was not particularly useful in Chinese VTE patients during pregnancy and postpartum. Multicenter prospective validations of the RCOG model in Chinese maternal populations are needed.

Indexed as

antepartum and postpartumdeep venous thrombosispregnancy and postpartumpulmonary embolismrisk assessment modelsvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID36644567
PMCPMC9833322
OpenAlexW4313638383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.