ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2022
Role of an automated screening tool for familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with premature coronary artery disease.
Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia in a Finnish cohort of patients with premature coronary artery disease and elevated LDL-C levels.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: To validate an automated screening tool for patients with premature coronary artery disease (CAD) and high total cholesterol or LDL-C levels and assess if it would provide clinicians with additional support in identifying patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH). Methods: An IT-based automated screening tool based on coronary angiography data recorded in the KARDIO registry and laboratory values was validated among patients undergone coronary angiography in the Heart Hospital at Tampere University Hospital between 2007 and 2017 fulfilling the criteria of premature CAD (men <55 years and women <60 years) and history of high total cholesterol (>8 mmol/l) or LDL-cholesterol (>5 mmol/l) levels. Electronic health records were retrospectively analyzed to determine if these patients had been diagnosed with FH based on clinical features and whether genetic testing had been conducted. Results: The automated screening tool identified 0.7% (211/28295) of all patients undergone coronary angiography and revealed history of high cholesterol in 8% (211/2678) of patients with premature CAD during the study period. Fifty-one percent (107/211) of these patients fulfilled the clinical criteria for probable/definite FH based on the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria.None of the patients had been diagnosed with FH based on clinical criteria before or after diagnosis of CAD. Thirteen percent of patients (n = 14) with probable/definite FH had been tested for genetic mutations of FH before or after CAD, five (36%) of them having a pathogenic FH variant. Two patients were referred to cascade screening. Conclusions: FH was underdiagnosed among the population studied. An automated screening tool in cardiac care could provide additional support for clinicians in diagnosing patients potentially having FH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.