Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644508›Full record

ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2021

Evaluation of contemporary treatment of high- and very high-risk patients for the prevention of cardiovascular events in Europe - Methodology and rationale for the multinational observational SANTORINI study.

Kausik K Ray, Inaam Haq, Aikaterini Bilitou, Carlos Aguiar, Marcello Arca, Derek L Connolly, Mats Eriksson, Jean Ferrières, Per Hildebrandt, Ulrich Laufs and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Lipid-Lowering Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 16 institutions in 14 countries.

Kausik K RayImperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Inaam HaqDaiichi Sankyo Europe, Munich, Germany.
Aikaterini BilitouDaiichi Sankyo Europe, Munich, Germany.
Carlos AguiarHeart Institute, Carnaxide, Portugal.
Marcello ArcaDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Derek L ConnollySandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham City Hospital, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mats ErikssonKarolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jean FerrièresDepartment of Cardiology and INSERM UMR 1295, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse University School of Medicine, Toulouse, France.
Per HildebrandtFrederiksberg Heart Clinic, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Ulrich LaufsUniversity Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Jose M MostazaLa Paz-Carlos III Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
David NanchenCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ernst RietzschelGhent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Timo StrandbergUniversity of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Hermann ToplakDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Frank L J VisserenDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Alberico L CatapanoDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan and Multimedica IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Daiichi Sankyo (Germany) · DEBirmingham City Hospital · GBCentre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHFrederiksberg Hospital · DKGhent University Hospital · BEHeidelberg University · DEHelsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences · FIHospital Universitario La Paz · ESImperial College London · GBInstituto do Coração · PTKarolinska University Hospital · SEMedical University of Graz · ATSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Clinical practice before 2019 suggests a substantial proportion of high and very high CV risk patients taking lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) would not achieve the new LDL-C goals recommended in the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines (<70 and < 55 mg/dL, respectively). To what extent practice has changed since the last ESC/EAS guideline update is uncertain, and quantification of remaining implementation gaps may inform health policy. Methods: The SANTORINI study is a multinational, multicentre, prospective, observational, non-interventional study documenting patient data at baseline (enrolment) and at 12-month follow-up. The study recruited 9606 patients ≥18 years of age with high and very high CV risk (as assigned by the investigators) requiring LLT, with no formal patient or comparator groups. The primary objective is to document, in the real-world setting, the effectiveness of current treatment modalities in managing plasma levels of LDL-C in high- and very high-risk patients requiring LLT. Key secondary effectiveness objectives include documenting the relationship between LLT and levels of other plasma lipids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and overall predicted CV risk over one year. Health economics and patient-relevant parameters will also be assessed. Conclusions: The SANTORINI study, which commenced after the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines were published, is ideally placed to provide important contemporary insights into the evolving management of LLT in Europe and highlight factors contributing to the low levels of LDL-C goal achievement among high and very high CV risk patients. It is hoped the findings will help enhance patient management and reduce the burden of ASCVD in Europe.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseHigh cardiovascular riskLDL cholesterolLipid-lowering therapy

Identifiers

PMID36644508
PMCPMC9833224
OpenAlexW3195248569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.