Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644503›Full record

ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2021

Utilization of IVUS improves all-cause mortality in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography.

Iryna Dykun, Olga Babinets, Stefanie Hendricks, Bastian Balcer, Rishi Puri, Fadi Al-Rashid, R Alexander Jánosi, Matthias Totzeck, Tienush Rassaf, Amir A Mahabadi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Detectable troponin below the 99International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Iryna DykunDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Olga BabinetsDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stefanie HendricksDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Bastian BalcerDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Rishi PuriDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Fadi Al-RashidDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
R Alexander JánosiDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Matthias TotzeckDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Tienush RassafDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Amir A MahabadiDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DECleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Available data suggest that the use of IVUS for guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) improves the prognosis of patients undergoing complex interventions. We aimed to examine how the utilization of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) affects patient survival irrespective of procedure complexity. Methods: The present analysis is based on the longitudinal ECAD registry of consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography between 2004 and 2019. The incidence of death due to any cause was evaluated during a mean follow-up of 3.4 years. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association of IVUS utilization with incident mortality. Results: Overall, data from 30,814 coronary angiography exams (mean age 64.9 ± 12.5 years, 70.3% male) were included, among which 4991 procedures (16.2%) were guided by IVUS. Utilization of IVUS was associated with a 35% reduction in mortality, independent of traditional risk factors (0.64(0.58-0.71), p < 0.0001). The effect of IVUS on mortality was equally present in patients undergoing IVUS-guided coronary interventions (0.75[0.67-0.84], p < 0.0001) as well as purely diagnostic coronary angiography exams (0.62[0.56-0.72], p < 0.0001). In patients without coronary intervention, IVUS utilization led to a higher frequency of aspirin (82.6% vs. 61.9% for IVUS vs. no IVUS, p < 0.0001) and statin therapy (74.9% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In a large longitudinal registry cohort of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography, IVUS utilization was associated with lower long-term mortality. The beneficial role of IVUS utilization on survival was equally present for coronary interventions and diagnostic coronary angiograms. Our results support the use of intravascular imaging for decision making in interventional cardiology.

Indexed as

Coronary angiographyCoronary artery diseaseECAD registryIntravascular ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36644503
PMCPMC9833231
OpenAlexW3179162834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.