Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644493›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2023

How Memory Counts in Mathematical Development.

Ilse E J I Coolen, Julie Castronovo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ilse E J I CoolenDepartment of Psychology, University of Hull, Cottingham road, Hull, HU67RX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2254-7851
Julie CastronovoDepartment of Psychology, University of Hull, Cottingham road, Hull, HU67RX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0565-5917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory has been well-established as a predictor of mathematics achievement in child development. Nevertheless, empirical evidence remains elusive on the unique role of the different forms of memory and their specific mechanisms as predictors of mathematics development. Therefore, in this study, the role of visuospatial short-term memory, visuospatial working memory, verbal short-term memory, and verbal long-term memory was investigated at three key stages of the development of mathematics (5-6 years, 6-7 years, 7-8 years), as well as their interactions across development. The relation between the different memory types and informal and formal mathematics was also studied. The findings of this study provide empirical support for a shift in the relation between different memory types and mathematics achievement over development with: 1) visuospatial short-term memory predicting informal mathematics achievement at the age of 5-6 years; 2) visuospatial working memory predicting informal and formal mathematics achievement at the age of 6-7 years; and 3) verbal short-term memory predicting formal mathematics achievement at the age of 7-8 years. These shifts clearly appear consistent with children's mathematics curriculum content over time and the requirements of mathematics acquisition at specific stages in development. With these findings, the unique role of various forms of memory in the development of mathematics and the timeframe in which they play a crucial part is highlighted, which should be taken into consideration for future research and possible intervention studies in children's mathematics achievement.

Indexed as

DevelopmentMemoryNumerical Cognition

Identifiers

PMID36644493
PMCPMC9818043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.