Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644324›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2022

Reprogramming the Canine Glioma Microenvironment with Tumor Vaccination plus Oral Losartan and Propranolol Induces Objective Responses.

Dylan T Ammons, Amanda Guth, Aaron J Rozental, Jade Kurihara, Angela J Marolf, Lyndah Chow, John F Griffin, Rebecca Makii, Brittany MacQuiddy, Mary-Keara Boss and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Losartan controls immune checkpoint blocker-induced edema and improves survival in glioblastoma mouse models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dylan T AmmonsDepartments of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Amanda GuthDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Aaron J RozentalDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Jade KuriharaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Angela J MarolfDepartments of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Lyndah ChowDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
John F GriffinDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Rebecca MakiiDepartments of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Brittany MacQuiddyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Mary-Keara BossDepartments of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Daniel P ReganDepartments of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Chad FrankDepartments of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Stephanie McGrathDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Rebecca A PackerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Steven DowDepartments of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Colorado State University · USTexas College · US

Funding

Optimizing Novel Immunotherapy Combinations Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment in Canine Spontaneous OsteosarcomaU01CA224182 · NCI · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DOW, STEVEN W., LONDON, CHERYL A · 2017 to 2022
$2.8M
Veterinary Pre-Doctoral Research Scholars ProgramT32OD012201 · OD · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI VANDEWOUDE, SUE · 2013 to 2019
$795k
Elucidating the role and regulation of periostin in therapy-induced chemoresistance in metastatic breast cancerK01OD022982 · OD · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI REGAN, DANIEL PATRICK · 2016 to 2021
$720k
NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR002126NCI NIH HHS U01 CA224182NIH HHS K01 OD022982NIH HHS T32 OD012201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Malignant gliomas have a highly immune suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) which renders them largely unresponsive to conventional therapeutics. Therefore, the present study evaluated a therapeutic protocol designed overcome the immune barrier by combining myeloid cell targeted immunotherapy with tumor vaccination. Experimental Design: We utilized a spontaneously occurring canine glioma model to investigate an oral TME modifying immunotherapy in conjunction with cancer stem cell (CSC) vaccination. Dogs were treated daily with losartan (monocyte migration inhibitor) and propranolol (myeloid-derived suppressor cell depleting agent) plus anti-CSC vaccination on a bi-weekly then monthly schedule. Tumor volume was monitored by MRI and correlated with patient immune responses. Results: Ten dogs with histologically confirmed gliomas were enrolled into a prospective, open-label clinical trial to evaluate the immunotherapy protocol. Partial tumor regression was observed in 2 dogs, while 6 dogs experienced stable disease, for an overall clinical benefit rate of 80%. Overall survival times (median = 351 days) and progression-free intervals (median = 163 days) were comparable to prior studies evaluating surgical debulking followed by immunotherapy. Dogs with detectable anti-CSC antibody responses had an increased overall survival time relative to dogs that did not generate antibody responses (vaccine responder MST = 500 days; vaccine non-responder MST = 218 days; p = 0.02). Conclusions: These findings suggest that combining myeloid cell targeted oral immunotherapy with tumor vaccination can generate objective tumor responses, even in the absence of conventional therapy. Overall, this approach has promise as a readily implemented therapeutic strategy for use in brain cancer patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesGliomaAnimalsDogsLosartanPropranololProspective StudiesTumor MicroenvironmentVaccinationCancer VaccinesLosartanPropranolol

Identifiers

PMID36644324
PMCPMC9835010
OpenAlexW4309323105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.