Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644291›Full record

ArticleNature computational science2022

A flexible Bayesian framework for unbiased estimation of timescales.

Roxana Zeraati, Tatiana A Engel, Anna Levina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature computational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Emergent critical oscillations in motor cortex of Parkinson's patients.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roxana ZeraatiInternational Max Planck Research School for the Mechanisms of Mental Function and Dysfunction, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Tatiana A EngelCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Anna LevinaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

Multiscale computational frameworks for integrating large-scale cortical dynamics, connectivity, and behaviorRF1DA055666 · NIDA · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI ENGEL, TATIANA · 2021 to 2021
$1.3M
Discovering dynamic computations from large-scale neural activity recordingsR01EB026949 · NIBIB · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI ENGEL, TATIANA · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026949NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA055666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timescales characterize the pace of change for many dynamic processes in nature. Timescales are usually estimated by fitting the exponential decay of data autocorrelation in the time or frequency domain. Here we show that this standard procedure often fails to recover the correct timescales due to a statistical bias arising from the finite sample size. We develop an alternative approach which estimates timescales by fitting the sample autocorrelation or power spectrum with a generative model based on a mixture of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) processes using adaptive approximate Bayesian computations (aABC). Our method accounts for finite sample size and noise in data and returns a posterior distribution of timescales that quantifies the estimation uncertainty and can be used for model selection. We demonstrate the accuracy of our method on synthetic data and illustrate its application to recordings from primate cortex. We provide a customizable Python package implementing our framework with different generative models suitable for diverse applications.

Identifiers

PMID36644291
PMCPMC9835171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.