Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644288›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment2023

Assessing Internalizing Symptoms and Their Relation with Levels of Impairment: Evidence-Based Cutoffs for Interpreting Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) Scores.

A De la Rosa-Cáceres, O M Lozano, M Sanchez-Garcia, F Fernandez-Calderon, G Rossi, C Diaz-Batanero

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A De la Rosa-CáceresDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Ciencias de La Educación, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3719-0840
O M LozanoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Ciencias de La Educación, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2722-6563
M Sanchez-GarciaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Ciencias de La Educación, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3375-8347
F Fernandez-CalderonDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Ciencias de La Educación, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2981-1670
G RossiPersonality and Psychopathology Research Group (PEPS), Department of Psychology (PE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6803-9820
C Diaz-BataneroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Ciencias de La Educación, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3392-4683
Universidad de Huelva · ESVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tests and scales measuring psychological disorders should provide information about how scores relate to other constructs such as quality of life or functional impairment. Such information is necessary to allow that their scores contribute to clinical decision making. The current study analyzes the clinical utility of the Spanish version of the Inventory for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) to discriminate between different levels of functional impairment and identify the IDAS-II scales that contribute most to explaining impairment. The total sample (

Indexed as

AnxietyAssessmentCutoffsDepressionEmotional DisordersImpairmentPROMs

Identifiers

PMID36644288
PMCPMC9830132
OpenAlexW4315487011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.