Endoscopic full-thickness resection with retroperitoneal dissection for duodenal myogenic cyst with adjustable traction from an independently controlled snare.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Endoscopic full-thickness resection using double endoscope-assisted snare traction for a large exophytic gastric subepithelial lesion.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
   Article
2. Defect closure with endoscopic suturing improves endoscopic full-thickness resection of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Endoscopy · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as