Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644216›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction2021

Supporting collaborative reflection on personal values and health.

Andrew B Berry, Catherine Y Lim, Calvin A Liang, Andrea L Hartzler, Tad Hirsch, Dawn M Ferguson, Zoe A Bermet, James D Ralston

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Approaches to Tailoring Between-Session Mental Health Therapy Activities.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  7. MigraineTracker: Examining Patient Experiences with Goal-Directed Self-Tracking for a Chronic Health Condition.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  8. "You Can See the Connections": Facilitating Visualization of Care Priorities in People Living with Multiple Chronic Health Conditions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew B BerryNORTHWESTRN UNIVERSITY, CHICAGO IL.
Catherine Y Lim98POINT6, SEATTLE WA.
Calvin A LiangUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE WA.
Andrea L HartzlerUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE WA.
Tad HirschNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, BOSTON WA.
Dawn M FergusonFACEBOOK, SEATTLE WA.
Zoe A BermetKAISER PERMANENTE WASHINGTON HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE, SEATTLE WA.
James D RalstonKAISER PERMANENTE WASHINGTON HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE, SEATTLE WA.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of Washington · USMeta (United States) · USNortheastern University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

University of Washington Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training ProgramT15LM007442 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN H. GENNARI, Andrea L. Hartzler · 2002 to 2026
$19.6M
Seeing and Sharing What Matters: Personal Health Libraries for Individuals with Multiple Chronic ConditionsR01LM012813 · NLM · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI RALSTON, JAMES D. · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012813NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) need support to identify and articulate how their personal values relate to their health. We drew on previous research involving people with MCC to develop three prototypes for supporting reflection on relationships between values and health. We tested these prototypes in a qualitative study involving 12 people with MCC. We identified benefits and limitations to building on patients' existing visit-preparation practices; revealed varying levels of comfort with deep, exploratory reflection involving a facilitator; and found that reflection oriented toward the future could elicit hopeful attitudes and plans for change, while reflection on the past elicited strong resistance. We discuss these findings in relation to previous literature on designing for reflection in three areas: shifting between self-guided and facilitator-guided reflection, balancing between outcome-oriented and exploratory reflection, and exploring temporality in reflection.

Indexed as

concordancemultiple chronic conditionspatient-clinician communicationreflection

Identifiers

PMID36644216
PMCPMC9837878
OpenAlexW3207087635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.