Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36644134›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2023

Use of clinicopathological factors to predict prognosis of fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia.

Xiaobo Zhang, Xiaoya Zhao, Chen Wang, Shanshan Lu, Yiqin Wang, Yijiao He, Jianliu Wang, Danhua Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaobo ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Xiaoya ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Chen WangDepartment of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Shanshan LuDepartment of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Yiqin WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Yijiao HeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Jianliu WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Danhua ShenDepartment of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) has been gradually increasing over the past decade. Fertility-sparing therapy with progestin is a treatment option for EEC or endometrial atypical hyperplasia (AH). The present study evaluated the role of numerous prognostic factors following fertility-sparing therapy for EEC or AH. Furthermore, the present study assessed the strength of various clinicopathological indicators for the prediction of treatment efficacy. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with EEC and AH who received fertility-sparing therapy between August 2013 and September 2021 at Peking University People's Hospital (Beijing, China). Endometrial specimens were obtained from each patient after 3 months of treatment and at the end of the fertility-sparing therapy, before treatment efficacy and prognosis were evaluated using the χ

Indexed as

endometrial atypical hyperplasiaendometrial endometrioid carcinomafertility sparingpathologyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36644134
PMCPMC9811621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.