ArticleCureus2022
Parent and Physician Preference for Anxiolytic Medication Prior to Laceration Repair in Young Children.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Pediatric laceration repair is a daunting process for parents and physicians. The repair could take place quickly if the child is calm and relaxed.This study aimeds to evaluate parental and physician preference for anxiolytic medication administration prior to laceration repair, with a pre-and post-repair survey on parents' and physicians' initial preference and follow-up perception. Methods Parents or guardians of children aged six months to five years who presented with simple lacerations and their physicians were asked to complete a survey on potential benefits and expectations of anxiolytic use before and after the laceration repair. Results Fifty parents/guardians completed the survey. Forty-three (86%) expressed their preference for anxiolytic medication use if it had been available, before laceration repair. Parents/guardians perceived reactions to laceration repair before and after the procedure were significant, ranging from "uncontrolled crying" to "continuous crying" (p=.032). The parents/guardians overwhelmingly preferred to take part in the decision-making process during the repair (not significant). Preference for anxiolytic use was high before repair at 54% and increased to 62% after witnessing the procedure (not significant). Physicians who completed the survey supported the use of anxiolytics 84% of the time. Forty (80%) physicians preferred the intranasal route, while parents/guardians preferred the oral route (58%). Conclusions Procedural sedation is critical for anxiety control and to minimize the difficulties related to treatment. In our study, parents and physicians supported the administration of an anxiolytic agent to help alleviate anxiety and achieve optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.