ArticleCureus2022
The Comparison of QTc Dispersion Between Renal Transplant Recipients and Healthy Individuals.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of death in patients with end-stage renal failure. The increase in QTc interval time and QT dispersion increases the risk of cardiac arrhythmia and mortality. In our study, QT and QTc dispersions (QTcd) of patients who underwent renal transplantation were compared with normal healthy individuals. Methods Electrocardiograms (ECGs) of 80 renal transplant recipients and 70 healthy individuals were taken. QTc dispersion was calculated by using the longest and the shortest QT interval and QT dispersion and Bazett's formula. Results When the groups were compared, similar QT dispersion and QTc dispersion were observed (control group and renal transplant recipient patients: 35 ± 17 ms and 36 ± 16 ms and 52 ± 18 ms and 54 ± 22 ms, respectively). Conclusion No statistical difference was observed between QT and QTc dispersions of renal transplant patients compared to healthy individuals. This result shows that the increase in QT dispersion and pathophysiological mechanisms observed frequently in uremic patients can be reversed by renal transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.