Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643997›Full record

ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2021

Effectiveness and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors in real-world clinical practice. An observational multicentre study. The IRIS-PCSK9I study.

Marina Blanco-Ruiz, Laura Amaya-Pascasio, Reyes de Torres Chacón, María Josefa Álvarez Soria, Antonio Arjona-Padillo, María Magdalena Carrillo Bailén, Rodrigo Milán Pinilla, Irene Pérez Ortega, Belén Sánchez Rodríguez, Luis Andrade Zumárraga and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Monoclonal Anti-PCSK9 Antibodies: Real-World Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marina Blanco-RuizStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Laura Amaya-PascasioStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Reyes de Torres ChacónStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
María Josefa Álvarez SoriaStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Jaén University Hospital, Jaén, Spain.
Antonio Arjona-PadilloStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
María Magdalena Carrillo BailénStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Jaén University Hospital, Jaén, Spain.
Rodrigo Milán PinillaStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Irene Pérez OrtegaStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Belén Sánchez RodríguezDepartment of Pharmacy. Torrecárdenas, University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Luis Andrade ZumárragaStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Roberto Valverde MoyanoStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Spain.
Manuel Payán OrtizStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Alba María Castillo FernándezStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Jaén University Hospital, Jaén, Spain.
Cristina Del Toro PérezStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Pablo González BustosStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Eduardo Agüera MoralesStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Spain.
Purificación Sánchez LópezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Beatriz Hidalgo MartínStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Jaén University Hospital, Jaén, Spain.
Ricardo Roa ChamorroStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Javier Fernández PérezStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
María Victoria Mejías OlmedoStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Patricia Martínez-SánchezStroke Unit and Department of Neurology, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Complejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: The benefits of the PCSK9 inhibitors, alirocumab and evolocumab, in lowering LDL-cholesterol and preventing major adverse cardiac events (MACE) have been demonstrated in pivotal clinical trials. However, few studies of routine clinical practice have been conducted to analyse and compare the efficacy and safety of the two drugs. Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients treated with a PCSK9 inhibitor in five hospitals in Andalusia (southern Spain). Baseline demographic and clinical data, LDL-cholesterol levels and the occurrence of MACEs during the follow-up period were recorded. Results: A total of 141 patients were included in the study: 90 were treated with alirocumab and 51 with evolocumab. The patients' mean age (IQR) was 58 (11) years and 58 (41%) were women. The most frequent concomitant medications were statins, 94 (66.7%), followed by antiplatelet therapy (66%) and ezetimibe (65.2%). The median (IQR) follow-up period was 18 (18) months, with 18 (24) for alirocumab and 11 (18) for evolocumab. At the six-month follow-up visit, LDL-cholesterol values had decreased to pre-treatment levels and remained significantly decreased ( Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab in routine clinical practice are consistent with the findings of the pivotal clinical trials.

Indexed as

AlirocumabCardiovascular diseaseEvolocumabHypercholesterolemia familiarPCSK9iStatins intolerance

Identifiers

PMID36643997
PMCPMC9833257
OpenAlexW3206963843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.