Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643971›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Methods primers2022

Serial femtosecond crystallography.

Thomas R M Barends, Benjamin Stauch, Vadim Cherezov, Ilme Schlichting

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Methods primers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas R M BarendsDepartment for Biological Mechanisms, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benjamin StauchDepartment of Chemistry, The Bridge Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Vadim CherezovDepartment of Chemistry, The Bridge Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ilme SchlichtingDepartment for Biological Mechanisms, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Structural Biology Of G Protein-Coupled ReceptorsR35GM127086 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Vadim Cherezov · 2018 to 2026
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of X-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs), new, high-throughput serial crystallography techniques for macromolecular structure determination have emerged. Serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX) and related methods provide possibilities beyond canonical, single-crystal rotation crystallography by mitigating radiation damage and allowing time-resolved studies with unprecedented temporal resolution. This primer aims to assist structural biology groups with little or no experience in serial crystallography planning and carrying out a successful SFX experiment. It discusses the background of serial crystallography and its possibilities. Microcrystal growth and characterization methods are discussed, alongside techniques for sample delivery and data processing. Moreover, it gives practical tips for preparing an experiment, what to consider and do during a beamtime and how to conduct the final data analysis. Finally, the Primer looks at various applications of SFX, including structure determination of membrane proteins, investigation of radiation damage-prone systems and time-resolved studies.

Identifiers

PMID36643971
PMCPMC9833121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.