ArticleCatena2023
Mapping abandoned cropland using Within-Year Sentinel-2 time series.
Article in Catena, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of global change factors on the functional genes of soil nitrogen and methane cycles in grassland ecosystems: a meta-analysis.Oecologia · 2024Pooled it
- Revealing the distribution and change of abandoned cropland in Ukraine based on dual period change detection method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A 30-m annual grassland dataset from 1991 to 2020 for Inner Mongolia, China.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic and various armed conflicts, the world is experiencing an unprecedented food crisis. The reclamation of abandoned cropland with food production potential may increase the global food supply in a short period of time, ensuring food security. At present, the extraction of abandoned cropland is mainly based on low- and medium-resolution remote sensing image data, making it difficult to extract fragmented areas in mountainous regions and to distinguish between abandoned cropland and transitional classes (such as fallow cropland). We developed a change-detection method based on within-year Sentinel-2 time series to extract cropland abandoned from 2018 to 2021 and defined four types of croplands, namely spontaneously abandoned, induced abandoned, fallow, and lost cropland, using Linxia County in mountainous China as the study region. First, cropland objects were generated from multi-temporal Sentinel-2 images using the multi-resolution segmentation method, and the land use map of Linxia County from 2017 to 2021 was drawn using random forest classifier. Second, through defining and identifying different cropland types, the interannual dynamic changes in cropland from 2018 to 2021 were extracted by analyzing the annual land use change trajectory. Third, by analyzing the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) time series of cropland within-year, the active and cultivated cropland sites within-year were extracted by threshold segmentation. Finally, the changes in the four cropland types were extracted by intersecting the two result types. Our method captured the object level changes well (overall mapping accuracy = 93 ± 5 %), and the extraction accuracy of abandoned cropland reached 81 ± 2 %. Abandoned cropland was mostly located in areas of medium quality and with a moderate distance from rural settlements. Reclamation can potentially increase the grain production in Linxia County by at least 3.6 % and needs to be combined with the local natural geography and human activities. Our method is a robust method for extracting abandoned cropland and may be applied to other research related to land use change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.