Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643959›Full record

ArticleBiological invasions2023

Alien and cryptogenic fungi and oomycetes in Austria: an annotated checklist (2nd edition).

Hermann Voglmayr, Anna Schertler, Franz Essl, Irmgard Krisai-Greilhuber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological invasions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impacts of biological invasions.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hermann Voglmayr *Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7666-993X
Anna Schertler *BioInvasions, Global Change, Macroecology-Group, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6682-7719
Franz EsslBioInvasions, Global Change, Macroecology-Group, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8253-2112
Irmgard Krisai-GreilhuberDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1078-3080
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal invasions can have far-reaching consequences, and despite increasing relevance, fungi are notoriously underrepresented in invasion science. Here, we present the second annotated checklist for alien and cryptogenic fungi and oomycetes in Austria. This list contains 375 taxa of which 278 are classified as established; compared to the first checklist from 2002, this amounts to an almost five-fold increase and the number of decade-wise first records is steadily rising since the mid-twentieth century. The introduction pathway is unclear for the vast majority of taxa, while the main means of spread within the country is unassisted secondary spread. Fungi were predominantly introduced from the Northern Hemisphere, especially North America and Temperate Asia. Rates of newly recorded alien fungi differ among phyla; the majority belongs to the Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10530-022-02896-2.

Indexed as

EumycotaMycorrhizaNeomycetesParasitesPseudofungiSaprobionts

Identifiers

PMID36643959
PMCPMC9832105
OpenAlexW4297009731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.