ArticleHeliyon2023
Phylogenetic analysis of all available monkeypox virus strains shows the close relatedness of contemporary ones.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathogenic signatures and therapeutic evaluation of emergent MPXV Clade Ib in low-susceptibility and immunocompromised mouse models.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Genomic epidemiology of mpox virus during the 2022 outbreak in New York City.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Genomic Evolution and Epidemiological Impact of Ongoing Clade Ib MPox Disease: A Narrative Review.Global health, epidemiology and genomics · 2025Review
- Bioinformatic identification of monkeypox virus phylogenetic gene trees that are representative of its whole-genome phylogenetic tree.Virus genes · 2024Article
- Extraction-free LAMP assays for generic detection of Old World Orthopoxviruses and specific detection of Mpox virus.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present research aimed to evaluate the diversity of all monkeypox virus strains with a special focus on recently isolated ones by a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of all available sequences, based on the concatenate of four viral genes. Almost all current strains from 2022 showed a high level of similarity to each other on the analyzed stretches: 218 strains shared identical sequence. Among all analyzed strains, the highest number of differences was counted compared to a RefSeq strain (Zaire-96-I-16) on the whole concatenate. Our analysis supported the distinction between Clade I (formerly Congo Basin clade), IIa and IIb (together formerly West African clade) strains and classified all 2022 strains in the last one. The high number of differences and long branch observable concerning strain Zaire-96-I-16 is most probably caused by a sequencing error. As this strain represents one of the two available reference sequences in GenBank, it is recommendable to confirm or exclude the concerning mutation. The developed method, based on four gene sequences, reflected the established whole-genome-based intraspecies classification. Although this method provides significantly less information about the strains compared to whole genome analyses, since its resolution is much lower, it still enables the rapid subspecies classification of the strains into the established clades. The genes in the analyzed concatenate are so conserved that further differentiation of contemporary strains is impossible; these strains are identical in the analyzed sections. On the other hand, since whole genome analyses are compute-intensive, the described method offers a simpler and more accessible alternative for monitoring and preliminary typing of newly sequenced monkeypox virus strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.