Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643900›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Phylogenetic analysis of all available monkeypox virus strains shows the close relatedness of contemporary ones.

Mária Benkő, Balázs Harrach, Győző L Kaján

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mária BenkőVeterinary Medical Research Institute, Hungária krt. 21, 1143 Budapest, Hungary.
Balázs HarrachVeterinary Medical Research Institute, Hungária krt. 21, 1143 Budapest, Hungary.
Győző L KajánVeterinary Medical Research Institute, Hungária krt. 21, 1143 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present research aimed to evaluate the diversity of all monkeypox virus strains with a special focus on recently isolated ones by a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of all available sequences, based on the concatenate of four viral genes. Almost all current strains from 2022 showed a high level of similarity to each other on the analyzed stretches: 218 strains shared identical sequence. Among all analyzed strains, the highest number of differences was counted compared to a RefSeq strain (Zaire-96-I-16) on the whole concatenate. Our analysis supported the distinction between Clade I (formerly Congo Basin clade), IIa and IIb (together formerly West African clade) strains and classified all 2022 strains in the last one. The high number of differences and long branch observable concerning strain Zaire-96-I-16 is most probably caused by a sequencing error. As this strain represents one of the two available reference sequences in GenBank, it is recommendable to confirm or exclude the concerning mutation. The developed method, based on four gene sequences, reflected the established whole-genome-based intraspecies classification. Although this method provides significantly less information about the strains compared to whole genome analyses, since its resolution is much lower, it still enables the rapid subspecies classification of the strains into the established clades. The genes in the analyzed concatenate are so conserved that further differentiation of contemporary strains is impossible; these strains are identical in the analyzed sections. On the other hand, since whole genome analyses are compute-intensive, the described method offers a simpler and more accessible alternative for monitoring and preliminary typing of newly sequenced monkeypox virus strains.

Indexed as

MonkeypoxPhylogenetic analysisRefSeq

Identifiers

PMID36643900
PMCPMC9829444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.