Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643898›Full record

ArticleFASEB bioAdvances2023

"Student-led workshop strengthens perceived discussion skills and community in an interdisciplinary graduate program".

Catharine Shipps, Kyra L Thrush, Clorice R Reinhardt, Sara A Siwiecki, Jennifer L Claydon, Dorottya B Noble, Corey S O'Hern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB bioAdvances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catharine ShippsIntegrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA.
Kyra L ThrushIntegrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA.
Clorice R ReinhardtIntegrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA.
Sara A SiwieckiIntegrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA.
Jennifer L ClaydonPoorvu Center for Teaching and Learning Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0119-8218
Dorottya B NobleIntegrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9017-9985
Corey S O'HernIntegrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

Convergent graduate training in systems biology at YaleT32GM145452 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KATHRYN MILLER-JENSEN, Corey O'Hern · 2022 to 2026
$1.0M
Convergent Graduate Training in Engineering, Physics and BiologyT32EB019941 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI O'HERN, COREY · 2016 to 2020
$998k
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB019941NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology (IGPPEB) at Yale University brings together Ph.D. students from the physical, engineering, and biological sciences. The main goals of this program are for students to become comfortable working in an interdisciplinary and collaborative research environment and adept at communicating with scientists and nonscientists. To fill a student-identified learning gap in engaging in inclusive discussions, IGPPEB students developed a communication workshop to improve skills in visual engagement, citing specific content, constructive conversation entrances, and encouragement of peers. Based on short- and long-term assessment of the workshop, 100% of students reported that it should be offered to future cohorts and 63% of students perceived it to be personally helpful. Additionally, 92% of participants reported using one or more of the core skills beyond the course, with skills in "Encouraging peers" and "Constructive conversation entrances" rated the highest in perceived improvement. Based on the highest average rating of 76 ± 24 (on a scale of 0-100), students agreed that the workshop made them feel more welcome in the IGPPEB community. With a rating of 68 ± 13, they also agreed that the workshop had a positive impact on their graduate school experience. Participants provided suggestions for future improvements, such as increasing student involvement in leading discussions of course material. This study demonstrates that a student-led workshop can improve perceived discussion skills and build community across an interdisciplinary program in the sciences.

Indexed as

curriculum improvementdiscussion workshopevaluation and assessmentgraduate training programinterdisciplinary trainingscience communication skills

Identifiers

PMID36643898
PMCPMC9832528
OpenAlexW4306674738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.