ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2023
Artificial Intelligence in Reproductive Medicine - An Ethical Perspective.
Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Old and new" frontiers in embryo viability assessment: current practices and introduction of emerging approaches.Biology of reproduction · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Embryo Selection: Current Approaches and Clinical Implications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in infertility treatment: Applications, challenges, and future directions: A narrative review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Regulating algorithmic tools in reproductive health: ethical and legal challenges.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Routine IVF Practice.Biology · 2025Review
- Genetic and Epigenetic Risks of Male Infertility in ART.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Current progress and open challenges for applying artificial intelligence across thePatterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Innovations in assisted reproductive technology through the advances in artificial intelligence and image processing.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Assessing Reproductive Aging: Role of Mitochondria, Oxidative Stress, and Telomere Biology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A New Era in Fertility Treatment.Cureus · 2025Review
- The use of artificial intelligence in sexual and reproductive health: a comprehensive scoping review.npj women's health · 2025Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Gynecologic Oncology Decision-Making: A Feasibility Study.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence models and combined scoring approaches for endometrial receptivity assessment inFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in IVF Laboratories: Elevating Outcomes Through Precision and Efficiency.Biology · 2024Review
- Non-invasive prediction of human embryonic ploidy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Quality of IVM ovarian tissue oocytes: impact of clinical, demographic, and laboratory factors.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Single Sperm RNA signatures reveal MicroRNA biomarkers for male subfertility.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- A Combination of Artificial Intelligence with Genetic Algorithms on Static Time-Lapse Images Improves Consistency in Blastocyst Assessment, An Interpretable Tool to Automate Human Embryo Evaluation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is steadily being integrated into all areas of medicine. In reproductive medicine, artificial intelligence methods can be utilized to improve the selection and prediction of sperm cells, oocytes, and embryos and to generate better predictive models for in vitro fertilization. The use of artificial intelligence in this field is justified by the suffering of persons or couples who wish to have children but are unable to conceive. However, research into the use of artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine is still in the early experimental stage and furthermore raises complex normative questions. There are ethical research challenges because evidence of the efficacy of certain pertinent systems is often lacking and because of the increased difficulty of ensuring informed consent on the part of the affected persons. Other ethically relevant issues include the potential risks for offspring and the difficulty of providing sufficient information. The opportunity to fulfill the desire to have children affects the welfare of patients and their reproductive autonomy. Ultimately, ensuring more accurate predictions and allowing physicians to devote more time to their patients will have a positive effect. Nevertheless, clinicians must be able to process patient data conscientiously. When using artificial intelligence, numerous actors are involved in making the diagnosis and deciding on the appropriate therapy, raising questions about who is ultimately responsible when mistakes occur. Questions of fairness arise with regard to resource allocation and cost reimbursement. Thus, before implementing artificial intelligence in clinical practice, it is necessary to critically examine the quantity and quality of the data used and to address issues of transparency. In the medium and long term, it would be necessary to confront the undesirable impact and social dynamics that may accompany the use of artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.