ArticleJournal of human kinetics2022
Construct Validity and Applicability of a Team-Sport-Specific Change of Direction Test.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Acute effects of virtual-reality and dual-task warm-up on game-related speed paradigms in elite ice hockey athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Investigating the coach's eye when evaluating and selecting 3 × 3 basketball players.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- FITLIGHT Training and Its Influence on Visual-Motor Reactions and Dribbling Speed in Female Basketball Players: Prospective Evaluation Study.JMIR serious games · 2025Article
- Validation, Reliability, and Usefulness of the Functional Agility Square Test [FAST].Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- What Variables Differentiate between Selected and Not Selected High-Performance Adolescent Track and Field Athletes?Journal of human kinetics · 2025Article
- Associations Between Sprint Mechanical Properties and Change of Direction Ability and Asymmetries in COD Speed Performance in Basketball and Volleyball Players.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Study on the Impact of Implementing an Exercise Program Using Fitlight Technology for the Development of Upper Limb Coordinative Abilities in Basketball Players.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Concurrent-Validity and Reliability of Photocells in Sport: A Systematic Review.Journal of human kinetics · 2024Review
- Talent selection in 3 × 3 basketball: role of anthropometrics, maturation, and motor performance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Differences in Situational Patterns During Change of Direction Movements Greater than 90° in Youth Male and Female Soccer Players.Journal of human kinetics · 2023Article
- Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of Mobile Applications to Assess Change of Direction Speed.Journal of human kinetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cuts and changes of direction (COD) are frequent movements during games in team sports. Since those movements are seen as a key performance variable, COD assessments are included in performance diagnostics. However, some tests are criticized as they seem to be confounded by variables such as linear sprinting. Therefore, it is suggested that not only total COD time should be assessed, but also the athletes' COD movements should be examined more closely. For example, split times could be analyzed in tests with more than one COD like the Team-Sport-Specific COD (TSS-COD) test. We aimed to investigate the construct validity of the TSS-COD test, focusing on the homogeneity of the different test parts. We also tested how far sprint performance mapped onto COD performance. Test data were analyzed from 154 elite male and female volleyball and basketball athletes. A Fitlight© System was used to assess duration of the TSS-COD test. For the sprint tests, magnetic gates (Humotion GmbH) were used to measure sprint time. Explorative principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted including the test interval duration and the athletes' 5, 10, and 20 m sprint performance, to test the validity of the TSS-COD test. PCA results showed that the start interval formed a factor separate from the other COD sub-intervals. In addition, sprint performance was separated from all COD interval measures. The findings of the PCA were confirmed by split-half validation. Since sprint and COD performance represent independent performance domains within this analysis, we suggest the TSS-COD test to be a valid test to assess COD performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.