Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643801›Full record

ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2022

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in Germany: Results from the DA VINCI study.

Ioanna Gouni-Berthold, Frank Schaper, Ulrike Schatz, Anja Tabbert-Zitzler, Uwe Fraass, Sarah Sauer, Kausik K Ray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Bempedoic Acid: From Guidelines to the Real World.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2026
    Review
  4. Effect of renal denervation on the lipid profile in patients with or without coronary artery disease.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  5. [What is proven in the treatment of lipid disorders?]Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Established and Emerging Lipid-Lowering Drugs for Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioanna Gouni-BertholdUniversity of Cologne, Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Frank SchaperDiabetology Clinic, Dresden, Germany.
Ulrike SchatzUniversity Hospital "Carl Gustav Carus", Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany.
Anja Tabbert-ZitzlerAmgen Germany GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Uwe FraassAmgen Germany GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Sarah SauerAmgen Germany GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Kausik K RayImperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College, London, UK.
Amgen (Germany) · DEImperial College London · GBUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Cardiovascular mortality is high in Germany. For patients with high or very high cardiovascular risk, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines recommend intensive lipid lowering therapy (LLT). This study aimed to assess dyslipidaemia management and achievement of the ESC/EAS guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Methods: This European 18-country, cross-sectional, observational DA VINCI study (EUPAS22075) collected data during a single visit between June 2017 and November 2018 and included LLT in the preceding 12 months and the patients' most recent LDL-C measurement. Achievement of the risk-based 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C goals while receiving stabilized LLT was assessed. Data from the German cohort are presented here. Results: Seven German sites enrolled a total of 421 primary and secondary prevention patients, 327 were receiving stabilized LLT at the time of LDL-C measurement, i.e. statin monotherapy of high (16%; n = 53), moderate (49%; n = 160) or low (7%; n = 24) intensity, ezetimibe combination (18%; n = 58), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibody combination (3%; n = 9), and other LLT (7%; n = 23). The 2016 and 2019 risk-based LDL-C goals were attained by 46% (n = 149) and 28% (n = 92) of patients, respectively. Conclusions: There is a large gap between ESC/EAS recommendations and LDL-C goal achievement in routine clinical practice in high and very high-risk patients in Germany. Low-to-moderate-intensity statin monotherapy was the most frequently used LLT; use of high-intensity statins and combination therapy was limited. In addition to optimizing statin intensity, combination with non-statin LLT may be needed in most of these patients.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular riskCholesterolDa VinciDyslipidaemiaGoal attainmentGuidelinesStatins

Identifiers

PMID36643801
PMCPMC9833225
OpenAlexW4290960024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.