Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643788›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2023

The policy landscape for naloxone distribution in four states highly impacted by fatal opioid overdoses.

Robert M Bohler, Patricia R Freeman, Jennifer Villani, Tim Hunt, Beth S Linas, Alexander Y Walley, Traci C Green, Michelle R Lofwall, Carly Bridden, Lisa A Frazier and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Correlates of Rural Naloxone Possession Among People Who Use Drugs: A Multi-State Cross-Sectional Analysis.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Robert M BohlerInstitute for Behavioral Health, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453, United States.
Patricia R FreemanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Jennifer VillaniNational Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Tim HuntSchool of Social Work, Social Intervention Group (SIG), Center for Healing of Opioid and Other Substance Use Disorders (CHOSEN), Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Beth S LinasRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Alexander Y WalleyClinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Traci C GreenInstitute for Behavioral Health, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453, United States.
Michelle R LofwallDepartments of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Carly BriddenClinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Lisa A FrazierCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Evaluation Studies, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Laura C FanucchiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Jeffery C TalbertInstitute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Redonna ChandlerNational Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

MassHEAL - Reducing overdose deaths by 40% (2019-2023)UM1DA049412 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI SAMET, JEFFREY H. · 2019 to 2023
$82.9M
Kentucky CAN HEAL (Communities and Networks Helping End Addiction Long-term)UM1DA049406 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WALSH, SHARON L. · 2019 to 2022
$81.7M
CHASE: An Innovative County-Level Public Health Response to the Opioid Epidemic in New York StateUM1DA049415 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI EL-BASSEL, NABILA, GILBERT, LOUISA · 2019 to 2023
$77.3M
Optimizing HEALing in Ohio Communities (OHiO)-Health Equity SupplementUM1DA049417 · NIDA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FREISTHLER, BRIDGET J, WINHUSEN, T JOHN · 2019 to 2023
$66.3M
HEALing Communities Study Health Equity ResearchUM1DA049394 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI GLASGOW, LASHAWN, OGA, EMMANUEL AJA · 2019 to 2023
$40.6M
Training Program on HIV and Substance Use in the Criminal Justice SystemT32DA037801 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Nabila El-Bassel, Lisa R Metsch · 2014 to 2026
$5.7M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA037801NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049394NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049406NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049412NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049415NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Expanding access to naloxone is one of the most impactful interventions in decreasing opioid-related mortality. However, state distribution rates of naloxone are insufficient to meet community need. The current study sought to better understand this gap by focusing on state policies that may facilitate or impede naloxone distribution in four states highly impacted by fatal opioid overdoses - Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. Methods: We provide a descriptive analysis of the policy landscape impacting naloxone distribution through pharmacy and community channels in the four states participating in the HEALing Communities Study (HCS). Publicly available data and the expertise of the research team were used to describe each state's naloxone access laws (NALs), Medicaid coverage of naloxone, and community overdose education and naloxone distribution infrastructure. Data presented in this study represent the most current policy landscape through September 2022. Results: Variation exists between specific components of the NALs of each state, the structure of Medicaid coverage of naloxone, and the community distribution infrastructure networks. Massachusetts and New York have a statewide standing order, but other states use different strategies short of a statewide standing order to expand access to naloxone. Quantity limits specific to naloxone may limit access to Medicaid beneficiaries in some states. Conclusion: States participating in the HCS have developed innovative but different mechanisms to ensure naloxone access. Policies were dynamic and moved towards greater access. Research should consider the policy landscape in the implementation and sustainability of interventions as well as the analysis of outcomes.

Indexed as

Healing communities studyNaloxoneNaloxone access lawsOpioid policyOverdose prevention

Identifiers

PMID36643788
PMCPMC9838196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.