Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643733›Full record

ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2023

The Chinese Version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire-13: Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance for Medical Students.

Chen Jiang, Stefanos Mastrotheodoros, Yihong Zhu, You Yang, Souheil Hallit, Bing Zhao, Yuping Fan, Mengyi Huang, Cen Chen, Haiyan Ma and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessment of psychometric performance for the Chinese version of the Brief Inventory of Perceived Stress integrating exploratory graph analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chen Jiang *School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4383-262X
Stefanos MastrotheodorosDepartment of Psychology, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0936-6143
Yihong Zhu *The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5358-2276
You YangSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9722-9228
Souheil HallitSchool of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0001-6918-5689
Bing ZhaoThe Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuping FanSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Mengyi HuangSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7264-5751
Cen ChenSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Haiyan MaSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0847-5206
Runtang Meng *School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5826-5576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Stress may relate to an increased risk of psychological and physical disorders. Thus, a brief and efficient measurement instrument for researchers to measure stress is essentially needed. Participants and Methods: To assess measurement properties of the validated Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire-13 (PSQ-C-13), we conducted a two-wave longitudinal study from September to December, 2021 with a convenient sample of medical students. Results: A two-factor (constraint and imbalance) structure showed good fit indices (Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.972, Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.966, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] = 0.062). Spearman correlations with the Chinese Perceived Stress Scale-10 illustrated that convergent validity of the PSQ-C-13 was relatively satisfactory ( Conclusion: The two factors of the PSQ-C-13 including constraint and imbalance may adequately measure the level of stress on participants. The PSQ-C-13 is a convenient and efficient instrument that contains valid and reliable psychometric properties.

Indexed as

longitudinal surveymedical studentsPerceived Stress Questionnairepsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID36643733
PMCPMC9833320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.