Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643524›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

CFD Analysis on the Diffusion and Accumulation Characteristics of Microleakage LPG in an Integrated Stove.

Kan Jin, Gaofan Lin, Qi Zhao, Yajing Liu, Jia Qiu, Yong Jiang, Dongmei Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kan JinCollege of Quality & Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7882-5710
Gaofan LinCollege of Quality & Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China.
Qi ZhaoZhejiang Institute of Product Quality and Safety Science, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China.
Yajing LiuMinistry of Production Safety Supervision, Zhejiang Provincial Energy Group Company Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310007, China.
Jia QiuZhejiang Institute of Product Quality and Safety Science, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China.
Yong JiangZhejiang Institute of Product Quality and Safety Science, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China.
Dongmei HuangCollege of Quality & Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3957-2156
China Jiliang University · CNHenan Polytechnic University · CNZhejiang Energy Group (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gas microleakage, which results in gas diffusion and accumulation in domestic gas appliances, is the leading cause of indoor gas explosion accidents. To research the diffusion and accumulation characteristics of microleakage gas in domestic gas appliances, this study took an integrated stove as the research object and analyzed the effects of different leakage rates and leakage locations on the diffusion and accumulation characteristics of microleakage liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in its interior using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation method. The results show that microleakage LPG is characterized by a downward diffusion flow driven by gravity and the concentration inside the integrated stove cavity generally increases with the increase of leakage time; however, the spatial distribution is extremely inhomogeneous. In addition, the volume of the dangerous area rapidly changes with the continuous accumulation of microleakage LPG, occupying more than 50% of the cavity volume. Microleakage LPG diffusion and accumulation process are highly similar under different leakage rates; on the contrary, the location of the leakage source is closely related to the diffusion and accumulation characteristics. The diffusion distribution and accumulation position of microleakage LPG at different leakage locations present obvious differences. Typically, there is a concentration difference of 0.1-0.2% between the top and the bottom when the leakage source is located above the gas stove baffle and a concentration difference of 1.0-1.3% between the top and the bottom when the leakage source is located below the gas stove baffle. In addition, the difference in the leakage location has a significant impact on the time the concentration of LPG reaches the critical concentration, which indicates that the combustion and explosion risk of different leakage locations are highly related to the leakage time. The research can provide certain technical support for microleakage gas explosion accident prevention.

Identifiers

PMID36643524
PMCPMC9835542
OpenAlexW4313205249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.